摘要
目的探讨3.0 T磁共振常规脉冲序列T1WI、T2WI、弥散加权成像(diffusion weighted imaging,DWI)在肺癌检查中的成像质量及临床应用价值。材料与方法 43例肺癌患者分别行磁共振TSE-BLADE-T2WI、HASTE-T2WI、VIBE-DIXON-T1WI及EPI-DWI成像。分析不同扫描序列图像的运动伪影、支气管、肺癌病灶与继发阻塞性病变的显示情况。结果 HASTE图像运动伪影最少,运动伪影出现率为2%(1/43);支气管显示以TSE-BLADE序列最好;TSE-BLADE-T2、HASTE-T2和EPI-DWI区分肿块和继发性肺不张的鉴别率分别为72.7%、81.8%、81.8%,这3组两两之间比较差异无统计学意义(表概率分别为0.3446、0.3446、0.4135,P=1.0000),VIBE-T1序列未能区分。结论 3.0 T磁共振常规脉冲序列T1WI、T2WI、DWI图像各有优缺点,互为补充,在胸部影像检查中可以发挥其独有的优势。
Objective: To evaluate the image quality and clinical application of the routine magnetic resonance(MR) pulse sequences in lung cancer. Materials and Methods: Forty-three cases of lung cancer had done MR examinations at 3.0 T MR. Scan sequences were as followed, T2WI/TSE-BLADE, T2WI/HASTE, T1WI/VIBEDIXON, DWI/EPI. Analysed the motion artifact, bronchia, difference of lung lesions and secondary atelectasis of the different scanning sequence images. Results: The motion artifacts from respiration and pulsation on the HASTE images were better controlled than other three sequences, The motion artifacts appeared at a rate of 2%(1/43). Bronchia showed best in the TSE-BLADE sequence; TSE-BLADE-T2, HASTE-T2 and EPI-DWI could distinguish neoplastci foci and secondary atelectasis, identification rate was 72.7%, 81.8%, 81.8%, respectively, but there was no statistically significant difference between each other(table probability was 0.3446, 0.3446, 0.3446, P=1.0000). VIBE-T1 sequence failed to distinguish them. Conclusion: 3.0 T MR conventional pulse sequence image respectively have advantages and disadvantages, which can complement each other, can play its unique advantages in the chest imaging.
出处
《磁共振成像》
CAS
CSCD
2017年第2期115-119,共5页
Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
关键词
磁共振成像
脉冲序列
肺肿瘤
弥散加权成像
Magnetic resonance imaging
Pulse sequence
Lung neoplasms
Diffusion weighted imaging