期刊文献+

宋代枢密院司法事权考述

A study on the Judicial Powers of Privy Council in Song Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 枢密院作为宋代最高军事机构,具有军事司法监督与审判职能。一般军人的流、死罪案件以及疑难案件,枢密院有审查覆核之责;军官案件则须枢密院覆奏定判。尽管宋代统治者会在战时或平时军事审判中赋予相关军事官司必要的便宜权,以保障局部军队刑政的令行禁止,但是其主旨精神是高度维护日常军事审判秩序,谨慎权衡集权与便宜之间的关系。宋代统治者正是通过枢密院的司法事权强化对军队的绝对领导,从法制层面切实促进了中央军事集权的效果。 As the highest military organ, Privy Council had the function of the military judicial supervision and jurisdiction in the Song Dynasty. The soldiers' cases, including exile, death penalty, and difficult cases, must be reviewed by Privy Council. And the officers' cases must be reported to the emperor by Privy Council, too. For ensuring every order was executed without fail in local area, the rulers of the Song Dynasty sometimes could give the military judicial authority to the relevant institutions and persons at wartime or peacetime. But the rulers always paid great attention to safeguard the normal military judicial order. The rulers were very careful in balancing the centralization and the decentralization. It was through the judicial powers of Privy Council that the rulers of the Song Dynasty strengthened the absolute leadership over the army, and promoted the effect of the central military centralization from the legal aspect.
作者 张明
出处 《历史教学(下半月)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期32-36,67,共6页 History Teaching
基金 陕西省社科基金项目"宋代军事赏罚制度研究"(项目编号:12H028)的阶段性成果之一
关键词 宋代 枢密院 司法事权 Song Dynasty, Privy Council, the Judicial Powers
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献88

  • 1陈峰.北宋枢密院长贰出身变化与以文驭武方针[J].历史研究,2001(2):29-38. 被引量:21
  • 2王明清.《挥麈录·后录》卷1[M].上海书店出版社,2001年..
  • 3《近臣与外官--试析北宋初期的枢密院与其长官人选》,载漆侠主编.《宋史研究论文集》,河北大学出版社2002年版,第9页.
  • 4粱太济.《北宋前期的中枢机构及渊源》.《宋史研究集刊》第二辑.,1988年.第65页.
  • 5田况.《儒林公议》,朱易安等主编.《全宋笔记》第一编第五册,大象出版社2003年版,第115页.
  • 6马端临.文献通考[M].北京:中华书局,1986..
  • 7王铚.默记[M].北京:中华书局,1981..
  • 8.《续资治通鉴长编》卷20[M].,太宗太平兴国四年九月丙午..
  • 9章如愚.山堂考索[M].北京:中华书局,1992..
  • 10司马光.资治通鉴[M].中华书局,1956.8685,8635,8921.

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部