期刊文献+

基于学生发展的学校自我诊断实施流程——学校自我诊断研究之二 被引量:3

The Implementation Process of School Self-Diagnosis Based on Students Development——The Second Study on School Self-Diagnosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学校自我诊断实施流程是否合理,会在很大程度上决定诊断的有效性。2010年起,课题组经过与多所实验学校的深入合作,发现学校自我诊断的实施包含以下三个阶段:启动前的必要准备,包括与学校领导层达成共识、帮助学校成立内部自我诊断组、形成科学可靠的诊断工具等;专业化的数据采集与分析,包括通过对流程细节的把控保证数据的真实性、通过多角度收集混合数据、充分利用电子系统优势等;诊断结果的解读、使用与改进监督,包括诊断结果解读和使用的有效策略、通过学校的自身改进推动"诊断—改进—再诊断"的良性循环等。 Whether the implementation process is reasonable or not will largely determine the effectiveness of school self-diagnosis. We assume the implementation process of school self-diagnosis includes the following three stages through the in-depth cooperation with multiple schools since 2010: firstly,necessary preparation before the actual launch,which includes reaching agreement with school management team,and helping school to construct the self-diagnosis group within school and forming a set of scientific and reliable instrument ; secondly , professional data collection and analysis, which means keeping data authenticity through managing the process details,collecting mixed data from multiple perspectives and taking full advantage of electronic system; thirdly,interpreting and using the results and tracking the improvement,which includes grasping the strategy of interpreting and using results, and promoting the “ diagnosis-improvement-diagnosis” virtuous cycle based on schools' self-improvement.
出处 《教育测量与评价》 2017年第2期11-15,共5页 Educational Measurement and Evaluation
关键词 学校自我诊断 实施流程 学校改进 school self-diagnosis,implementation process, school improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1胡咏梅,薛海平.小学自我评估现状需改进[J].中小学管理,2005(6):46-47. 被引量:7
  • 2骈茂林.学校自我评估:意义、问题及其改进[J].当代教育科学,2006(2):57-60. 被引量:19
  • 3卢立涛.权力下放、绩效责任与学校自我评估[J].高校教育管理,2007,1(1):25-30. 被引量:8
  • 4姜超.转型期西方学校评价的发展与启示[J].当代教育科学,2007(5):57-59. 被引量:2
  • 5Clift, P. S., Nuttall, D. L. & McCormick, R. Studies in School Self-evaluation[M]. London: Falmer Press.1987.
  • 6Davies D. & Rudd, P. Evaluating School Self-evaluation. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.2001.
  • 7Ehren, M. M. & Visscher, A. J. The Relationships between School Inspections, School Characteristics and School Improvement[J]. British Journal of Educational Studies. 2008, 56(2 ): 205-227.
  • 8Blok, H., Sleegers, P. & Karsten, S. Looking for a Balance Between Internal and External Evaluation of School Quality: Evaluation of the SVI Model[J]. Journal of Educational Policy, 2007,23(4 ):379-395.
  • 9Macbeath, J. Schools Must Speak for Themselves: The Case for School-evaluation[M]. London: Routledge Falmer. 1999.110.
  • 10Davies D. & Rudd, P. Evaluating School Self-evaluation. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research. 2001.160.

共引文献34

同被引文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部