期刊文献+

检察机关提起公益诉讼若干问题研究 被引量:3

On Some Questions of the Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 检察机关提起公益诉讼制度是十八届四中全会确立的检察改革任务之一。该项工作开展以来,为我们提供了很多实践范本,也带来了很多实践困惑。诉前程序方面的主体、时限、采纳问题,证据方面的取证方式、举证责任分配、证据种类问题,诉讼活动方面的诉讼请求、诉讼地位、执行问题等均是争议的焦点。检察机关提起公益诉讼应以合法性和客观性为依据,兼顾该项制度的特殊性,方能凸显其价值和生命力。 The system of the procuratorial public interest litigation is one of the important assignments during the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee. The development of the system provides a lot of practical samples as well as perplexity. The focus for dispute includes the subjects, the time limits and the adoption of the pretrial proceedings, methods of evidence collection, the distri-bution of evidential burden, the sorting of evidence, lawsuit claim, the status of litigation and the execution. The values and vitality of the system can be revealed with its legality and objectivity as well as its particularity.
作者 赵辉
出处 《昆明学院学报》 2017年第1期81-85,共5页 Journal of Kunming University
关键词 检察机关 公益诉讼 诉前程序 适格主体 证据 诉讼活动 procuratorate public interest litigation pretrial proceedings adaptive subject evidence legal action
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1张晓玲.行政公益诉讼原告资格探讨[J].法学评论,2005,23(6):134-141. 被引量:58
  • 2章志远.行政公益诉讼热的冷思考[J].法学评论,2007,25(1):17-24. 被引量:87
  • 3[7]Per Lawton LJ in R v Turner[1975] QB 834 at 841,cited with approval by Lord Wilberforce in DPP v Jordan[1977] ADC 699 at 718.See also,generally,I Dennis The Law of Evidence (London:Sweet & Maxwell,1999) at.654-673,A Keane The Modern Law of Evidence (4th edition) (London:Butterworths,1996).453-475 and C Tapper Cross and Tapper on Evidence (8th edition) (London:Butterworths,1995).543-562.For a discussion of this particular aspect of the use and limits of expert evidence in an Australian context,see,for example,Farrell v The Queen 1998.HCA 50 at paragraphs 29 and 91-95.
  • 4[8]Buckley v Rice-Thomas (1554) 1 Plowd 118 at 124.http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v6n4/banks64.html
  • 5[9][10] "Amicus Curiae".Tech Law Journal,http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossary/legal/amicus.htm
  • 6[16]Mark De Wolfe Howe ed.,Holmes-Laski Letters:The Correspondence of Mr.Justice Holmes and Harold J.Laski,1916-1935,v.0l.1.Harvard University Press,1953.248-249
  • 7郄建荣.《社团环境公益行政诉讼第一案立案》,载《法制日报》2009年7月29日.
  • 8江必新:“论公益诉讼的价值及其建构”,载《人民法院报》2009年10月29日.
  • 9台建林.《农工党中央.由检察机关挑起行政公益诉讼重担》,载2007年3月14日《法制日报》第6版.
  • 10刘长.《首例环保公益行政诉讼破冰背后》,载2009年8月10日《民主与法制时报》第A04版.

共引文献50

同被引文献6

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部