期刊文献+

从施琅看媒介记忆视角下历史人物的形象变迁 被引量:1

Creating Shi Lang:Image Change of Historical Figures in a Perspective of Media Memory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 施琅是有争议的历史人物。以媒介记忆为核心理论,将施琅置于官方与民间两个截然不同的主体之下,官方记忆与民间记忆在媒介形态选取上存在差异。受媒介记忆内部机制和外部环境的影响,施琅形象呈现出不同的特点,不仅有官方不同时期评价标准下的形象变迁,也有民间记忆中较为固定的祖先崇拜形象。在大传统与小传统的互动中,官方借用了民间,民间也借用了官方,但这种"借用"更多地呈现出一种认可和接纳的态度。民间不仅成为官方权力征用的资源,也成为国家权力和意识形态的表达空间。 Shi Lang is a controversial historical figure. By taking the media memory as the core theory, and putting Shi Lang into the two different subjects between official memory and civil one, this paper finds that there are differences between the official memory and the folk memory in the choice of media forms, which are influenced by the internal mechanism of media memory and the external environment. Shi Lang’s image has different characteristics in not only the image changes under the official evaluation standard in different periods,but also in fixed ancestor worship image of folk memory. In the interaction between the large tradition and the small tradition, the official makes “use” of the folk while the folk also makes “use” of the official. However, this “use” shows an attitude of recognition and acceptance. The folk not only becomes the official resources for the expropriation of power,but also becomes the expression space of state power and ideology.
作者 施凉凉
机构地区 福建师范大学
出处 《龙岩学院学报》 2017年第1期83-88,共6页 Journal of Longyan University
关键词 媒介记忆 形象变迁 施琅 官方 民间 media memory image change Shi Lang official folk
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1石泰安 耿昇译.《川甘青藏走廊古部落》[M].四川民族出版社,1992年版..
  • 2.《华夏边缘—历史记忆与族群认同》[M].台北:允晨文化实业股份公司,1997年..
  • 3王明珂.《根基历史:羌族的弟兄故事》[A].黄应贵主编.《时间、历史与记忆》[C].中研院民族研究所(台北),1999年版..
  • 4Lewis A. Coser, "Introduction: Maurice Halbwachs," in On Collective Memory, ed. & trans, by Lewis A. Coser(Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992).
  • 5Maurice Halbwachs, Les cadres sociaux de la memoire (Paris:Presses Universitaires de France, 1952).
  • 6Frederick Bartlett, Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (London: Cambridge University Press, 1932), pp. 199-202, 296.
  • 7James Fentress and Chris Wickham, Social Memory (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1992), p. Ⅸ .
  • 8Robert J. Sharer & Wendy Ashmore, Archaeology: Discovering Our Past (Mountain View, CA. : Mayfield Publishing Co., 1987), pp. 72-75.
  • 9王明珂.《历史文献的社会记忆残余本质与异例研究—考古学的隐喻》,《民国以来的史料与史学》,国史馆(台北),1998年.
  • 10Henry S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas(USA: Dorset Press, 1986/1861).

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部