摘要
通过对105份裁判文书及学者学说的阅读整理,发现对于预约合同可否强制履行,无论是在司法实务中还是理论上都存在着很大的争议。通过分析,认为从违约责任的法条规定、合同自愿原则和预约合同的目的来看,应认可预约合同是可以强制履行的。
Through the 105 judgment and scholars theory review, whether pre-contract could be enforced in judicial practice or theory is controversial. Through analyses, from the perspective of liability for breaching the contract, the voluntary principle and the purpose of the pre contract, pre-contract can be enforced.
出处
《莆田学院学报》
2017年第1期34-37,共4页
Journal of putian University
关键词
预约合同
强制履行
裁判文书
违约责任
pre-contract
compulsory execution
judgment documents
liability for breaching the contract