摘要
介绍了SSDI材料的技术要求,并与EN-GJS-400-18U-LT材料进行了对比。利用数值模拟软件对2种材料的热节、可能产生的缩松区域及大小进行对比,模拟结果显示:这2种材料的热节位置基本相同,但从凝固模拟结果上看,SSDI材料比EN-GJS-400-18U-LT材料的缩松倾向大。为进一步验证SSDI材料的缩松情况,进行铸件试制。通过对缩松面积较大的区域进行解剖,确定了SSDI材料比EN-GJS-400-18U-LT材料的缩松倾向大。此次对比试验,为后续的正式生产积累了丰富的经验,有利于工艺设计人员制订工艺,有效减少废品的产生。
Technical requirements of SSDI material were introduced and were compared with EN-GJS-400-18U-LT. By using numerical simulation software, two materials were compared in the respects of hotspots areas where shrinkage porosities may occur and their sizes. The simulation results showed:two materials have basically the same hot spots position,however the solidification simulation results indicated that the shrinkage porosities tendency of SSDI was more severe than EN-GJS-400- 18U-LT. The above-mentioned comp.arison accumulated abundant experience which is helpful to the casting method designer to method the jobs and thereby effectively reduce rejected castings.
出处
《现代铸铁》
CAS
2017年第1期75-77,共3页
Modern Cast Iron
关键词
球墨铸铁
SSDI材料
热节
缩松
nodular iron
SSDI material
hot spot
shrinkage porositiess