1Swanson, C. B. & Barlage, J. influence : A study ofthe factors shaping Education Policy. Edi.toral Project Projects in Education Research Centre. 2006. pii. 19.
2National Assessment of Educational Progress. How the Board Works [ OB/OL]. hap://nagb, org/what - we - do/board - works/responsi- bilities,2009 - 03 - 01.
3Horkay, N. 1999.The NAEP Guide: A description of the Content and methods of the 1999 and 2.000 assessments. U.S. Department of Education. National Centre for Statictics. 10.
4Ja90, C.2009. A history of NAEP Assessment Frameworks. Paper Commissioned for the 20th Anniversary of the National Assessment Governing Board 1988 - 2008,4 - 6.
5NAGB. 2002, Item Development and Review. Policy Statement,4 - 6.
6Pamlmer, E.A., &Barley, Z.A. (2008).What states can learn about state standards and assessment systems ftom No Child Left Behind doeumens and interviews with Central Region assessment directors. Washington, D.C.U.S. Department of Education.Institute of Education Science National Centre for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Education Laboratary Centrak. 7,.
7Sheida, W., Connie, S., & Alan, V. 2000. How does NAEP ensure consistency in stoning? Focus on NAEP,4(2):3- 4.
8教育部.基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)[Z].,2001..
9Robert Rothman, Jean B. Slattery, and Jennifer L. Vranek. 2002. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing. CSE Technical Report 566 [DB/OL]. http://www, cse. ucla. edu.
10Stephen Chappuis, Richard Stiggins, Judith Arter, and Jan Chappuis. Assessment For Learning. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute [E]. 2005.
