期刊文献+

美国教育质量评价体系的构成及启示 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 NAEP(National Assessment of Educational Progress)即教育质量评价体系,是美国目前最具引导性的教育评价体系,这一体系为学生受到科学教育提供了可靠保证。通过对该评价体系进行梳理、剖析,对我国建立科学、有效的教育评价体系具有良好的启示作用。
作者 罗文蔚
机构地区 湖北文理学院
出处 《教学与管理(中学版)》 北大核心 2017年第3期82-84,共3页 Journal of Teaching and Management
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1Swanson, C. B. & Barlage, J. influence : A study ofthe factors shaping Education Policy. Edi.toral Project Projects in Education Research Centre. 2006. pii. 19.
  • 2National Assessment of Educational Progress. How the Board Works [ OB/OL]. hap://nagb, org/what - we - do/board - works/responsi- bilities,2009 - 03 - 01.
  • 3Horkay, N. 1999.The NAEP Guide: A description of the Content and methods of the 1999 and 2.000 assessments. U.S. Department of Education. National Centre for Statictics. 10.
  • 4Ja90, C.2009. A history of NAEP Assessment Frameworks. Paper Commissioned for the 20th Anniversary of the National Assessment Governing Board 1988 - 2008,4 - 6.
  • 5NAGB. 2002, Item Development and Review. Policy Statement,4 - 6.
  • 6Pamlmer, E.A., &Barley, Z.A. (2008).What states can learn about state standards and assessment systems ftom No Child Left Behind doeumens and interviews with Central Region assessment directors. Washington, D.C.U.S. Department of Education.Institute of Education Science National Centre for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Education Laboratary Centrak. 7,.
  • 7Sheida, W., Connie, S., & Alan, V. 2000. How does NAEP ensure consistency in stoning? Focus on NAEP,4(2):3- 4.
  • 8教育部.基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)[Z].,2001..
  • 9Robert Rothman, Jean B. Slattery, and Jennifer L. Vranek. 2002. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing. CSE Technical Report 566 [DB/OL]. http://www, cse. ucla. edu.
  • 10Stephen Chappuis, Richard Stiggins, Judith Arter, and Jan Chappuis. Assessment For Learning. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute [E]. 2005.

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部