《苏轼〈念奴娇·赤壁怀古〉新探》异议——兼谈学术研究的平等性、客观性与科学性

Objection to the New Exploration of“The Tune Niannujiao:Reflections on the Red Cliff”——Extra Discussion on the Equity,Objectivity and Scientificity of Academic Researches

苏轼《念奴娇·赤壁怀古》的主旨和创作年历来有所争论。在"无任何文献资料可证明"的情形下,《苏轼〈念奴娇·赤壁怀古〉新探》推出孤见,认为《赤壁怀古》是苏轼在宋神宗元丰四年十二月写宋同西夏之战灵州溃败的。"新探"凭借臆想、联想、设想来立论、设据和论证,有欠科学,不敢苟同。从苏轼作词的时序、景物、行实、思想、诗词文会通来看,《赤壁怀古》应是元丰五年苏轼游黄州赤壁怀三国古之作。这是符合客观真实的,是可信的。

The argument on the tions on the Red Cliff＂never stops. Tune Niannujiao：Reflections on the any document as proof claimed by fourth year of Yuanfeng period of subject and creation time of Su Shi＇s＂The Tune Niannujiao：Reflec- It is really astonishing that the New Exploration of Su Shi＇s ＂The Red Cliff＂ （ hereafter referred to as the New Exploration ）, without its author, arbitrarily concluded that the tune was written in the Emperor Shenzong of Song and was on the defeat of Song in Lingzhou＇s fight against Western Xia regime. This conclusion totally based on imagination is not sound and convincible. Combining the time sequence of composition, scenery in tunes, life experience records, thoughts and texts, it is objective to define that this tune was made in the fifth year of Yuanfeng peri- od when Su Shi was traveling at the Red Cliff in Huangzhou in order to recall the Three Kingdoms Pe- riod.