期刊文献+

“分站式”杂交冠状动脉血运重建术治疗73例冠状动脉多支血管病变临床中期随访结果分析 被引量:7

Mid-term Outcomes of “2-staged” Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in Treating 73 Patients With Multi-vessel Coronary Artery Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察"分站式"杂交冠状动脉血运重建术(HCR)治疗冠状动脉多支血管病变中期随访结果,评价"分站式"HCR的可行性、安全性和疗效。方法:入选2012-01至2014-06因冠状动脉多支血管病变在我院行择期"分站式"HCR的患者共73例,其中男性50例(68.5%),女性23例(31.5%),平均年龄(61.1±10.7)岁,所有患者均为包括左前降支在内的多支病变。"分站式"HCR要点为:全麻双腔气管插管,左前胸第4或第5肋间小切口,直视下获取左乳内动脉,心脏跳动下完成左乳内动脉和左前降支的吻合。在小切口冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后3~7天,在介入导管室先行冠状动脉造影,观察左乳内动脉-左前降支旁路血管情况,证实其通畅后对非左前降支病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并置入支架。患者术后每年进行超声心动图、X线胸片和心电图检查,如患者出现心肌缺血表现,则进行冠状动脉增强计算机断层摄影术(CTA)或冠状动脉造影检查等。结果:本组患者均顺利施行"分站式"HCR,全组无手术死亡。外科手术时间(152.9±43.8)min,处理冠状动脉(2.6±0.5)支,术后总引流量(558.6±441.3)ml,输红细胞(0.8±1.9)U,机械通气时间(10.5±13.0)h。小切口CABG与PCI间隔时间(5.3±2.9)d,冠状动脉置入支架(1.6±0.7)枚。术后随访期间,主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)发生5例(6.8%),其中死亡1例(1.4%),再发心肌缺血3例(4.1%),需要接受CABG/PCI者1例(1.4%,因支架再狭窄,再次置入支架)。结论:"分站式"HCR是一种安全,有效的手术方式,其围手术期和中期随访结果满意,"分站式"HCR适合于左前降支严重病变无法接受PCI而右冠状动脉主干和(或)回旋支等非左前降支病变可以进行PCI的冠状动脉多支病变患者。 Objective:To observe the midterm outcomes of "2-staged" hybrid coronary revascularization(HCR) for treating the patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease(CAD) and to evaluate the feasibility,safety and efficacy of "2-staged" HCR.Methods:A total of 73 relevant patients received elective "2-staged" HCR in our hospital from 2012-01 to 2014-06 were studied.There were 50(68.5%) male and 23(31.5%) female at the age of(61.1±10.7) years and all patients had multi coronary artery lesions including left anterior descending(LAD) artery.The key points of "2-staged" HCR wereas follows:double-chamber intubation with general anesthesia,small incision between 4-5 ribs of left front thorax,take left internal mammary artery(LIMA) by direct view and make anastomosis of LIMA and LAD with heartbeat.At(3-5) days postminimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass(MIDCAB),coronary angiography(CAG) was conducted to confirm that LIMA-LAD bypass vessel was unobstructed;then percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) was performed in non-LAD coronary artery for stent implantation.Post-operative echocardiography,chest X-ray and ECG were examined in each year;coronary CTA or CAG would be taken if the patients with myocardial ischemia.Results:All patients finished "2-staged" HCR smoothly and no operative death occurred.The average surgical time was(152.9±43.8) min and(2.6±0.5) coronary branches were treated,total post-operative drainage volume was(558.6±441.3) ml,red blood cell transfusion was(0.8±1.9) U,mechanical ventilation time was(10.5±13.0) h.The interval between MIDCAB and PCI was(5.3±2) days and(1.6±0.7) stents was implanted.During post-operative follow-up period,there 1(1.4%) patient died,3(4.1%) with recurrent myocardial ischemia,1(1.4%) with in-stent restenosis and received PCI again,4(5.5%) with MACCE.Conclusion:"2-staged" HCR is a safe and feasible operation with satisfactory peri-operative and mid-term outcomes;it is suitable for the patients with multi-vessel CAD including severe LAD lesions.
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期17-20,共4页 Chinese Circulation Journal
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 冠状动脉旁路移植术 Coronary artery disease Angioplasty transluminal percutaneous coronary Coronary artery bypass grafting
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1Angelini GD, Wilde P, Salerno TA, et al. Integrated left small thoracotomy and angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery revascularisation. Lancet, 1996, 347: 757-758.
  • 2Jaffery Z, Kowalski M, Weaver WD, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2007, 31: 691-697.
  • 3Kim KB, Cho KR, Jeong DS. Midterm angiographic follow-up after off-pump coronary artery bypass: serial comparison using early, 1 year, and 5-year postoperative angiograms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008, 135: 300-307.
  • 4Halkos ME, Walker PF, Vassiliades TA, et al. Clinical and angiographic results after hybrid coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97: 484-490.
  • 5Gosev I, Leacche M. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization The Future of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery or an Unfulfilled Promise? Circulation, 2014, 130: 869-871.
  • 6Fujita T, Hata H, Shimahara Y, et al. Initial experience with internal mammary artery harvesting with the da Vinci Surgical System for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Surgery today, 2014, 44: 2281-2286.
  • 7DeRose JJ. Current state of integrated "hybrid" coronary evascularization// Cameron D, Wright, MD. Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Philadelphi: WB Saunders, 2009.21: 229-236.
  • 8Harskamp RE, Brennan JM, Xian Y, et al. Practice patterns and clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization in the United States: an analysis from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. Circulation, 2014, 130: 872-879.
  • 9Coulson AS, Glasgow EF, Bonatti J. Minimally invasive subclavian/ axillary artery to coronary artery bypass (SAXCAB): review and classification. Heart Surg Forum, 2001, 4: 13-25.
  • 10周伟,陆军,辛军,杜巍,黄虔,熊斌,周建平.杂交技术在治疗复杂冠心病中的临床应用[J].心脏杂志,2010,22(6):953-953. 被引量:4

共引文献8

同被引文献54

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部