期刊文献+

知识图谱中链接数据质量评价研究综述 被引量:4

A Review on Quality Assessment for Linked Data of Knowledge Graph
原文传递
导出
摘要 链接数据为知识图谱的主要表现形式,但目前链接数据的发布缺少统一标准,导致数据质量参差不齐.本文回顾了链接数据质量评价的相关研究,并根据链接数据的发展过程,将衡量数据质量的维度划分为7个类型,分别描述每个数据质量维度的特性.同时,具体介绍了冗余度、可信性的量化评价方法及波动性对链接数据质量的影响. Linked Data is the mainly expression form of knowledge graph, however. We have found that RDF datasets on the Web are of varying quality due to the lack of unified publishing principles, which influences the quality and accessibility of Linked Data. This paper divides the data quality dimensions into 7 types, and presents the charac- teristics of each data dimension. In addition, the quantitative calculation of redundancy and trustworthiness is de- scribed in detail. Our goal is to help the relevant researchers have a comprehensive understanding about the existing work and to promote the further development of Linked Data quality assessment.
出处 《武汉大学学报(理学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期22-38,共17页 Journal of Wuhan University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金(61673304 61272110) 国家社会科学基金重大计划(11&ZD189) 武汉市科技攻关计划(201110821225) 软件工程国家重点实验室(武汉大学)开放基金SKLSE2012-09-07
关键词 链接数据 质量评价 质量维度 知识图谱 linked data quality assessment quality dimension knowledge graph
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1刘柏嵩,高济.本体演化管理研究[J].计算机科学,2004,31(5):9-12. 被引量:13
  • 2Liu C, Chen W, Han Y. DODO: A mechanism helping to dynamically construct domain ontologies for services integration Proceedings of the International Workshop on Service Oriented Software Engineering in Conjunction with the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE06). Shanghai, China, 2006:13-18.
  • 3Peter H, York S. State-of-the-art on ontology evolution. Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany: Technique Report SEKT deliverable D3.1.1. b, 2004
  • 4Noy N F, Klein M. Ontology evolution: Not the same as schema evolution. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2004, 6(4): 428-440.
  • 5Sure Y, Angele J, Staab S. OntoEdit: Multifaeeted inferencing for ontology engineering. Journal on Data Semantics, 2003, 1(1):128-152.
  • 6Bechhofer S, Horrocks I, Goble C, Stevens R. OilEd: A reasonable ontology editor for the semantic web Proceedings of the Joint German/Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI-01). Vienna, Austria, 2001:306-408.
  • 7Stojanovic L, Motik B. Ontology Evolution within Ontology Editors Proeeedings of the OntoWeb-SIG3 Workshop at the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management ( EKAW02 ). Siguenza, Spain, 2002 ; 53-62.
  • 8Stojanovic L, Maedche A, Motik B, Stojanovic N. Userdriven Ontology Evolution Management Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management ( EKAW02 ). Siguenza, Spain, 2002:285-300.
  • 9Stojanovic L, Maedche A, Motik B, Stojanovic N. Ontology evolution as reconfiguration design problem solving Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP03). Sanibel Island, FL, USA, 2003:162- 171.
  • 10Stojanovic L. Methods and tools for ontology evolution [Ph. D. dissertation]. University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, 2004.

共引文献22

同被引文献55

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部