不确定法律概念和判断余地——一个教义学问题的法理思考

Indefinite Legal Conception and Discretion:A Dogmatic Problem Considered on the Base of Legal Theories

德国行政法教义学上"不确定法律概念可完全司法审查"是一个应予放弃的观念。从法理学的角度审视,这个观点的诸多前提条件是无法满足的。不确定法律概念的应用意味着规制密度的降低和向行政机关赋予酌定空间。承认不确定法律概念赋予行政机关酌定空间并不意味着行政司法审查强度的降低,原则的具体化思想既能为此提供可操作的方法和标准,也能更为完美地建构相应的教义学体系。在此特别值得深入思考的是,原则的具体化思想意味着何种属性的审查以及何种审查密度。针对这一问题,本文对于最低限度的审查尺度进行了细致的思考。

The notion of comprehensive judicial control over indefinite legal conception proposed by German administrative dogmatics shall be abandoned. The application of uncertain legal concepts implies a reduction of regulatory density and a discretionary space for the executive. From the perspective of jurisprudence, numerous prerequisites of this conception are unable to be fulfilled. Adaptation of indefinite legal conception, by which discretion of administrative organs increases, does not mean to decrease of strenth of judicial review. The idea of concretization of principle provides technically feasible methods and standards, so that a more perfect dogmatic system could be established. In particular, it is worth thinking deeply about what kind of attrib- ute examination and what kind of censorship density the idea of principle embodies. In view of this problem, this article has carried on the careful consideration to the minimum examination scale.