期刊文献+

从语义论元共指原则视角考察英语X-ee派生词 被引量:2

The Perspective of the Co-indexation Principle on Semantic Arguments: A Probe into English X-ee Derivatives
原文传递
导出
摘要 英语X-ee派生词常被错误地认为,其词基X仅为及物类动词,其语义角色主要表现为受事,但其实际语言编码形式远非如此简单。本文从当代美国英语语料库中提取数据,以语义论元共指原则为视角,考察英语X-ee派生词的诸种实际情况。研究发现有二:一是X-ee派生词中的词基X包括名词和动词两大类。其中,动词词基又分为五小类:及物动词、双宾语动词、管制介词动词、不及物动词和无相应指称论元动词;二是X-ee派生词因受后缀-ee与词基X的语义论元共指的制约作用,形成多种语义角色,而这些语义角色又因论元共指路径、语义匹配程度等因素而呈现由高至低的能产性梯度,表现为"受事类>间接宾语类/管制介词类>去名化人物名词类>施事类>无指称论元类"。 English X-ee derivatives have long been mistakenly viewed as patient nouns and their bases are considered to be only transitive verbs. However,the actual language encoding is not that simple. On the basis of the data extracted from the Corpus of Contemporary American English,and in the light of the Co-indexation Principle on Semantic Arguments,this study finds two main points:( 1) The bases of X-ee derivatives can be nouns and verbs. Moreover,the base verbs can be further divided into five categories as transitive verbs,ditransitive verbs,verbs with governed prepositions,intransitive verbs and verbs without arguments;( 2) The various arguments of X-ee derivatives are derived from the co-indexing processes of the affix and the bases' semantic arguments. Due to the co-indexing paths and semantic matching degrees,the productivity of these arguments presents a gradient from high to low : patient > indirect object and governed preposition> denominal person noun > agent > no argument.
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期33-41,共9页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"基于英汉浮现词缀的语言演变模型建构研究"(项目编号:14BYY001)的阶段性成果
关键词 X-ee派生词 语义框架 语义实体 语义论元共指 X-ee derivatives semantic skeleton semantic content co-indexation of semantic arguments
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献76

  • 1沈孟璎.汉语新的词缀化倾向[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),1986(4):93-99. 被引量:77
  • 2陈平.试论汉语中三种句子成分与语义成分的配位原则[J].中国语文,1994(3):161-168. 被引量:218
  • 3张吉生.英汉词缀对比分析[J].外语教学,2001,22(2):53-56. 被引量:18
  • 4沈家煊.“糅合”和“截搭”[J].世界汉语教学,2006,20(4):5-12. 被引量:249
  • 5陈新仁.词汇阻遏现象的顺应性阐释[J].外语学刊,2007(1):80-86. 被引量:41
  • 6Heyvaert, L.A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English [ M ]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003.
  • 7Kastovsky, D. Deverbal nouns in Old and Modem English: From stem-formation to word-formation [ A ]. J. Fisiak. Historical Semantics: Historical Word-Formation[ C]. Berlin, New York, etc. : Mouton de Gruyter, 1985.221-261.
  • 8Dalton-Puffer, C. Are Shakespeare's agent nouns different from Chaucer' s? -On the dynamics of a defivational subsystem[ A]. D. Kastovsky. Studies in Early Modem English [C]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1994.45- 58.
  • 9Ryder, M. E. Complex -er nominals : Where grammaticalization and lexicalization meet? [A]. E. Contini-Morava et al. Between Grammar and Lexicon[C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co., 2000.
  • 10Ryder, M. E. Mixers, mufflers and mousers: The extending of the -er suffix as a case of prototype reanalysis [ A ]. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17[C]. 1991. 299-311.

共引文献38

同被引文献119

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部