“强迫他人借钱”行为的罪名认定

The Accusation of " Forcing Others to Borrow Money"

当前,"强迫他人借钱"的行为时有发生。司法机关对此类行为的定性却时见分歧,集中起来主要包括三点争议:借钱行为是否属于强迫交易罪中的"服务";强迫借钱是否具有非法占有的目的;抢劫罪、敲诈勒索罪与寻衅滋事罪如何区分。单一地运用文理解释方法解决不了上述争议,必须综合运用文理解释、体系解释、目的解释等方法,对问题进行全面分析。

The protection of the citizens＇ safety and property is an important part of the social security system con- struction. At present, the action of ＂forcing others to borrow money＂ has occasionally occurred. However, judicial authorities cherish different views to determine this kind of behavior, which include three controversies： whether forcing others to borrow money belongs to the ＂commitment＂ of the crime of the forced transaction, whether forcing others to borrow money should be the purpose of illegal possession, how to distinguish the crime of robbery, the crime of extortion and the crime of defiance and affray. The single use of literal interpretation method can not solve the disputes, so we must use literal interpretation, frame explanation, teleological interpretation and other methods to analyze the problem.