期刊文献+

SDN控制器部署中的可靠性优化研究 被引量:3

The research on reliability optimization in SDN controller placement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 软件定义网络(SDN)将传统网络结构中的控制层和转发层解耦,其将所有转发设备与一个逻辑集中的控制器相连接。为避免网络规模不断扩大引起的单点失效,向分布式控制结构发展成为Open Flow广域网部署的趋势,其中控制层多控制器的部署问题是SDN设计中的一个关键环节。提出基于控制路径连通度的控制器部署方案来最大化SDN控制器部署的可靠性,并使用3种不同的算法对比控制器部署性能。仿真结果表明,该方案可以在可接受时延范围内提升部署SDN控制器的可靠性。 The Software Defined Networking(SDN) approach deeoupled control and forwarding planes in the traditional network archi- tecture. It connected all the forwarding devices to a logically centralized controller. To avoid single failure introduced by the expan- sion of network scale, distributed control architecture was going to be a new tendency in the deployment of OpenFlow WANs. The controller placement problem was one of the critical problems in SDN design. This paper proposed a controller placement scheme based on the connectivity of control path to maximize the reliability of controller placement in SDN, and used three different algo- rithms to contrast the performance. Simulation results show the scheme can enhance the reliability of SDN controller deployment within delay constraint.
出处 《电子技术应用》 北大核心 2017年第3期108-111,115,共5页 Application of Electronic Technique
基金 国家科技支撑计划课题(2014BAH30B01) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)课题(2012CB315901 2013CB329104) 国家自然科学基金课题(61372121 61521003) 国家高技术研究发展计划(863)课题(2015AA016102 2013AA013505)
关键词 SDN 控制器部署 可靠性优化 控制路径 SDN controller placement problem reliability optimization control path
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1McKeown N, Anderson T, Balakrishnan H, et al.OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks[J]. ACMSIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2008, 38(2):69-74.
  • 2Jain S, Kumar A, Mandal S, et al. B4: experience with aglobally-deployed software defined WAN[C]. The SecondACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in SoftwareDefined Networking, Hong Kong, 2013: 3-14.
  • 3ONF. software-defined networking: the new norm fornetworks, white paper[OL]. https://www.opennetworking.org, 2013. 12.
  • 4Mueller J, Wierz A, Vingarzan D, et al" Elastic networkdesign and adaptive flow placement in software definednetworks [C]. 2013 22nd International Conference onComputer Communications and Networks (ICCCN),California, 2013: 1—6.
  • 5Dixit A, Hao F, Mukherjee S, et al. Towards an elasticdistributed sdn controller[C]. The Second ACM SIGCOMMWorkshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking,Hong Kong, 2013: 7-12.
  • 6Sezer S, Scott-Hayward S, Chouhan P K, et al.. Are we readyfor SDN? Implementation challenges for software-definednetworks [J]. IEEE Communications Magazine、2013,51(7):36-43.
  • 7Levin D, Wundsam A, Heller B, et al" Logically centralized:state distribution trade-offs in software defined networks[C].Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on HotTopics in Software Defined Networking, New York, 2012: 1~6.
  • 8Heller B, Sherwood R, and McKeown N. The controllerplacement problem [C]. The First ACM SIGCOMMWorkshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking,New York, 2012: 7-12.
  • 9Hu Y, Wendong W, Gong X, et al. Reliability-awarecontroller placement for Software-Defined Networks[C]. 20131FIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated NetworkManagement (IM 2013), Sophia Antipolis, 2013: 672-675.
  • 10Hock D, Hartmann M, Gebert S, et al. Pareto-optimalresilient controller placement in SDN-based core networks[C].IEEE 2013 25th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC),California, 2013: 1-9.

共引文献12

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部