期刊文献+

基于DRGs死亡风险分级在医疗质量评价中的应用 被引量:22

Application of Mortality Risk Classification for Medical Quality Evaluation Based on DRGs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的基于疾病诊断相关组(Diagnosis Related Groups,DRGs)探讨死亡风险分级评价医院医疗质量的方法。方法以死亡风险分级方法评价医院整体医疗质量,进行科室间、专业间横向对比,并与总住院死亡指标进行比较。结果(1)总死亡率2015年0.137%低于2014年0.236%,低风险死亡率2015年0.008%高于2014年0,高风险死亡率2015年3.341%高于2014年1.773%;(2)非手术科室A和手术科室A在两类科室中总死亡率都是最高的,其中非手术科室A中高风险和高风险死亡率是最高的,而手术科室A仅中高风险死亡率是最高的;(3)MDCR专业组总死亡率为0.15%居第6位,低风险和中低风险死亡率分别为0.01%和0.24%。结论基于DRGs死亡风险分级是评价医院医疗质量的有效方法。 Objective To explore the method of mortality risk classification for medical quality evaluation based on DRGs.Method Morality risk classification method was applied to assess the overall hospital medical quality,horizontal comparison was done among departments,and they were compared with the assessment results from using the total hospital mortality.Results(1) 0.137% in 2015 was less than 0.236% in 2014 on total mortality rate.0.008% in 2015 was more than 0 in 2014 on low risk mortality.3.341% in 2015 was more than 1.773% in 2014 on high risk mortality.(2) Both non-surgical department A and surgical department A had the highest total mortality rate in departments of two types.And non-surgical department A had the highest medium-high risk mortality rate and high risk mortality rate,while surgical department A had the highest medium-high risk mortality rate.(3) The total mortality rate of MDCR professional groups was 0.15% ranking the sixth with low-risk and medium-low-risk mortality rate 0.01% and 0.24%respectively.Conclusion Mortality risk classification based on DRGs is an effective way to evaluate medical quality.
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2017年第3期44-46,共3页 Chinese Hospital Management
基金 北京医院协会2016年管理课题研究项目
关键词 疾病诊断相关组 死亡风险分级 医疗质量评价 DRGs mortality risk classification medical quality evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1黄慧英.诊断相关分类法在北京地区医院管理中的可行性研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,1994,10(3):131-136. 被引量:99
  • 2胡向阳,王原,张修梅.病例组合概念及其应用[J].中华医院管理杂志,1994,10(12):736-739. 被引量:36
  • 3简伟研,胡牧,崔涛,王洪源,黄因敏,张修梅.运用疾病诊断相关组进行临床服务绩效评价初探[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(11):736-739. 被引量:88
  • 4刘爱民.医院管理学(病案管理分册)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:241-250.
  • 5Grimaldi PL,Micheletti JA.Diagnosis related groups:a practitioner's guide[M].Chicago:Pluribus Press,1982:38-41.
  • 6Casas M.Issues for comparability of DRG statistics in Europe:results from EURODRG[J].Health Policy,1991,17:121-132.
  • 7Raymond RA.The new economics of health care:DRGs,case-mix,and length of stay[M].New York:Praeger Publishers,1984:15-16.
  • 8Stukenborg GJ,Wagner DP,Harrell FE,et al.Hospital discharge abstract data on comorbidity improved the prediction of death among patients hospitalized with aspiration pneumonia[J].J Clin Epidemio,2004,57:522-532.
  • 9Reid CM,Solterbeck A,Buxton BF,et al.Developing performance indicators for cardiac surgery:A demonstration project in Victoria[J].Heart,Lung and Circulation,2001,10:S29-S33.
  • 10Commonwealth of Australia.Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups,Version 5.0,Definitions Manual.2002,Canberra

共引文献138

同被引文献153

引证文献22

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部