摘要
东南沿海E市新区1%常住户抽样调查显示,98%以上的受访者对上访行为表示理解;在遭受利益损失或不公正对待、相对缓和的解决方式无效时,潜在的上访者比例会超过10%。排序逻辑模型回归结果说明,上访主要是为了解决问题,而非宣示政治主张;生活满意度低会导致更激烈的行为选择,潜在上访者具有社会心理学意义上的非理性特征;外地人、民企和外企人员、农民、下岗职工等体制外人群,选择上访的倾向更明显。
Our 1% household survey in a coastal city of southeast China shows that more than 98% respondents express their understanding of petitions ; when other resolutions fail to work in the case of interest loss or injus- tice suffers, more than 10% respondents choose to become potential petitioners. Regression results of the Or- dered Logistic Model further indicate that petitions are mainly chosen to solve problems, rather than to declare political ideas ; low life satisfaction leads to more intense choices of behaviors, hence potential petitioners are ir- rational in the sense of social psychology; migrant workers, staff of private or foreign enterprises, farmers and laid - off workers tend to appeal higher probability of petition.
作者
顾严
魏国学
Gu Yah Wei Guoxue(Chinese Academy of Macroeconomic Research, National Development and Reform Commission, Beijin)
出处
《经济社会体制比较》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期178-186,共9页
Comparative Economic & Social Systems
基金
国家发展改革委宏观经济研究院重点课题“重大决策社会稳定风险评估研究”(项目编号:A2013101013)
关键词
上访
潜在上访者
社会矛盾
治理
Petition
Potential Petitioner
Social Conflicts
Governance