摘要
通过比较密歇根大学和上海交通大学科研管理机构的组织定位、主要职能和运行模式,发现密歇根大学科研管理机构是扁平化和顾客导向的服务型组织,上海交通大学科研管理机构是科层化和行政导向的管制型组织。边界组织理论视角下我国研究型大学科研管理机构的功能重构和组织变革的路径是:建立以学术为本的全过程科研管理体制;建立校院二级科研管理体系;明确科研管理机构作为服务型边界组织的性质;建立学术群体认同的科研管理制度。
Through comparing organizational research management organization of the University scientific research management organization of the organization, while Shanghai Jiao Tong University' oriented regulatory organization. In the perspective orientation, main function and operation mode of scientific of Michigan and Shanghai Jiao Tong University, we find that University of Michigan is flat and customer-oriented service s research management office is hierarchical, administrative- of border organization, the paths of functional reorganization and organizational change of scientific research management organization of research universities in China include: establishing the whole process academic-oriented scientific research management system and two-level scientific research management system; clarifying service-oriented border organization; establishing
出处
《中国高教研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期67-71,共5页
China Higher Education Research
基金
上海市教育委员会委托项目"建设具有全球影响力的创新型大学研究"(ZXDF501005)的研究成果
关键词
科研管理机构
边界组织
组织变革
服务型行政
scientific research management oriented administration the nature of the scientific research management institution as scientific research management system with academic identity. organization
border organization, organizational reform
service-