流動的文本:劉向《洪範五行傳論》佚文考辨

On Lost Articles of the Hongfan Wuxing Zhuanlun of Liu Xiang

劉向《洪範五行傳論》亡於晚唐五代,這對我們了解漢代《洪範》五行學思想和《漢書·五行志》的編纂體例都産生了一定的影響。所幸在中古《五行志》及《唐開元占經》等典籍中,尚存有數量不小的《傳論》引文,但諸書引文體例各有差異,即使同一佚文亦常有不同。本文通過對諸書徵引《洪範五行傳論》體例的梳理,比勘同一佚文在不同著作中的不同形態,探討班固《五行志》以下諸書如何在《傳論》的"鈔録"中實現其自身的表達意圖。諸書所見《傳論》佚文不僅具有重要的輯佚學價值,更以自身的文本形態呈現了東漢至隋唐時期《洪範》五行學的演進過程,具有獨立的學術史價值,值得研究者關注。

The Hongfan Wuxing Zhuanlun(《洪範五行傳論》)of Liu Xiang was an important work in the history of Confucian classics,which gave us great help to know how the Confucian scholars in Han Dynasty cognized the calamities.Unfortunately,this work was lost no later than the Five Dynasties,which brought us some limit to understand the thoughts of the Five Elements in Han Dynasty.However,there were still some lost articles conserved in the historical records and Genus-books of the middle ancient times,which could help us to rebuild the structure of the work.This paper investigated the lost articles of the different books,and focused on the differences between the same lost articles conserved in different books.The paper believes that these differences were not only caused by the version change,but also caused by the different purposes and functions of the different books.