期刊文献+

放疗全流程管理及QA的初步应用经验 被引量:11

The primary experience of an entire QA workflow management in radiotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 回顾复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放疗QA工作历史及发展,提供全流程管理和QA工作初步应用经验.方法 采用失效模式与效应分析和PDCA循环为工具,从2015年4月开始在放疗中心实施全流程QA工作,并采集了实施前后近6000例患者的数据进行对比.结果 实施全流程QA后可能出错概率由17%下降到09%.结论 放疗全流程QA有效提高放疗准确性和安全性. Objective To retrospectively review the history and development of radiotherapy quality assurance ( QA) in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Fudan University, and to report the primary experience and evolvement of an entire QA workflow management. Methods The multidisciplinary QA team has implemented an entire QA workflow management process in the Radiotherapy Center using the failure modes and effects analysis ( FMEA) and plan-do-check-act ( PDCA) tool since April 2015. Treatment data of approximately 6000 patients before and after implementation were compared. Results The error rate was reduced from 17% to 09% after using the entire QA workflow management. Conclusions Entire QA workflow management effectively improves the accuracy and safety of radiotherapy.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期342-346,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 放射疗法 质量保证 流程管理 Radiotherapy Quality assurance Process management
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献27

  • 1Ford EC ,Terezakis S. How safe is safe? Risk in radiotherapy [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010, 78 ( 2 ) : 321-322. DOI: 10. lO16/j.ijrobp.2010.04.047.
  • 2Huang G ,Medlam G,Lee J,et al.Error in the delivery of radiation therapy:results of a quality assurance review [ J].Int J Radiat On- col Biol Phys, 2005,61 ( 5 ) : 1590-1595. DOI : 10. 1016/j. ijrobp. 2004.10.017.
  • 3Huq MS, Fraass BA, Dunscombe PB, et al. A method for evaluating quahty assurance needs in radiation therapy [ J] .Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008,71 ( 1 ) : S170-S173. DOI : 10.1016/j, ijrobp. 2007. 06.081.
  • 4. European Commission. Radiation Protection N. 181 : General guide- lines on risk management in external beam radiotherapy [ S ]. Brus- sels : European Commission,2015.
  • 5International Electrotechnical Commission.IEC31000 [ S].Geneva:International Electrotechnical Commission ,2009.
  • 6International Organization for Standardization. IS09000 [ S ]. Gene- va : International Organization for Standardization, 1994.
  • 7International Electrotechnical Commission.IEC31010[S] ,Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2009.
  • 8Ford EC, Gaudette R, Myers L, et al.Evaluation of safety in a radia- tion ontology setting using failure mode and effects analysis [ J ].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009,74 ( 3 ) : 852-858. DOI : 10.1016/j. ijrobp.2008.10.038.
  • 9Stamatis DH. Failure mode and effect analysis:FMEA from theory to execution [ M ] .2nd ed.Wisconsin : ASQ Quality Press, 2003.
  • 10Huq MS. Risk assessment introduetion-TG100 [ D]. Pittsburgh: AAPM Summer School, 2013.

共引文献11

同被引文献79

引证文献11

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部