史思明父子杀“胡”与政权失败

THE DISCUSSION ON SHI SIMING AND HIS SON KILLING THE BARBARIAN IN ANCIENT CHINA AND THEIR FAILURE OF REGIME

史思明杀害安庆绪时,连带屠杀与安庆绪同种族的胡人,史朝义弑父后,同样有杀害胡人的经历,这归根于史思明与安禄山不同种族之故。安禄山是落居东北的西域胡人,故能曲意迁就和拉拢当地各民族,反唐声势最为浩大。史氏父子则不同,更强调其突厥及土著的身份,导致种族联合的破裂,进而促使史朝义彻底覆灭。此巩固的种族团结的破坏,除一定程度上由政治形势变化所迫,史氏父子失策当属主要原因。

When Shi Siming killed An Qingxu, he also killed a large number of barbarians who came from the same race with An Qingxu. Shi Chaoyi had the same behavior after he murdered his father, because An Lushan and Shi Siming belong to dif-ferent ethnic tribes. An Lushan is the western barbarian in the the northeast of China, and he accommodated himself to won over the local nationalities, so the momentum against Tang government was the most significant, while Shi Siming and his son always emphasized their Turks and indigenous identity, resulting in large cracks appearing in ethnic joint, thus causing com-plete failure of Shi Chaoyi. The destruction of consolidation of the ethnic unity mainly results from Shi and his son5s misjudg- ment in addition to the changes of political situations to some extent.