期刊文献+

替吉奥或卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗进展期胃癌的临床对比 被引量:1

Clinical comparison of S-1 or capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较替吉奥或卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗进展期胃癌的近期疗效、生活质量和不良反应。方法:对收治的62例进展期胃癌患者进行回顾性分析,其中32例使用替吉奥联合奥沙利铂方案(A组,替吉奥40~60 mg/次,口服2次/d,第1~14天;奥沙利铂130 mg/m^2,静脉滴注2 h,第1天),30例使用卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂方案(B组,卡培他滨每次1 000 mg/m^2,口服2次/d,第1~14天;奥沙利铂130 mg/m^2,静脉滴注2 h,第1天),21 d为1个周期,完成2个周期后评价疗效、生活质量和不良反应。结果:A组和B组的总有效率分别为43.75%和46.67%,A组和B组的疾病控制率分别为56.25%和63.33%,A组和B组的生活质量改善率分别为50.00%和56.67%,A组和B组随访1年的生存率分别为71.88%和80.00%,A组和B组随访2年的生存率分别为56.25%和60.00%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组手足综合征发生率(43.33%)高于A组(15.63%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:替吉奥或卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗进展期胃癌疗效相近,不良反应均可耐受,值得临床推广。 Objective To compare the short-term effects、quality of life and adverse reactions of A scheme or B scheme in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Method The data of 62 cases with advanced gastric cancer were studied retrospectively. 32 cases were treated with S-1 combined with oxaliplatin( A group,oral administration of 40 ~ 60 mg S-1 twice a day for 14 days;intravenous injection of 130 mg / m2 oxaliplatin for 2 hours,in 1 st day,21 days for 1 cycles);30 cases were given capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin( B group,oral administration of 1 000 mg / m2 capecitabine twice a day for 14 days;intravenous injection of 130 mg /m2 oxaliplatin for 2 hours,in 1 st day,21 days for 1 cycles). The efficacy、quality of life and adverse reactions were evaluated after2 cycles. Results The effective rates and disease control rates in A group and B group were 43. 75% 46. 67% and 56. 25% 63. 33%,respectively. The improvement rates of life quality in A group and B group were 50. 00% 56. 67%,respectively. The survival rates of 1,2 years in A group and B group were 71. 88% 80. 00% and 56. 25% 60. 00%,respectively. There was no statistical difference in the above results( P〉0. 05). The incidence rate of hand-foot syndrome in B group was obviously higher than that in A group(43. 33% 15. 63%),the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 05). Conclusion S-1 or capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer is similar efficacy and less adverse reactions,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处 《吉林医学》 CAS 2017年第3期465-467,共3页 Jilin Medical Journal
关键词 替吉奥 卡培他滨 奥沙利铂 进展期胃癌 S-1 Capecitabine Oxaliplatin Advanced gastric cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献92

  • 1姜宝法,刘春晓,崔永春,徐涛,徐敏,王家林,杜君.EORTCQLQ-C30的信度、效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):31-32. 被引量:120
  • 2黄丽.大肠癌患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群变化与病程的相关性[J].湖北中医学院学报,2006,8(3):7-8. 被引量:13
  • 3展富琴,冯萍.恶性肿瘤患者化疗前后免疫功能的变化[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2007,17(1):137-138. 被引量:17
  • 4Mor V,Laliberte L,Morris JM,et al.The Kamofsky Performance Status Scale:An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting.Cancer 1984; 53(9):2002-7.
  • 5Schag CAC,Ganz PA,Wing DS,et al.Quality of life in adult survivors of lung,colon and prostate cancer.Qual Life Res 1994;3(2):127-41.
  • 6EORTC Quality of Life Group.EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.Third edition,Brussels :QL Coordinator,Quality of Life Unit,EORTC Data Center 2001.
  • 7Humy C,Bernhard J,Gelber RD,et al.Quality of life measures for patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer:an international trial.Eur J Cancer 1992;28(1):118-24.
  • 8EORTC Quality of Life Group.Guidelines for assessing Quality of Life in EORTC clinical trials.Brussels:Quality of Life Unit,EORTC Data Center 2002.
  • 9Sigurdardottir V,Bolund C,Brandberg Y,et al.The impact of generalized malignant melanoma on quality of life evaluated by the EORTC questionnaire technique.Qual Life Res 1993; 2(3):193-203.
  • 10Aaronson NK,Ahmedzai S,Bergman B,et al.The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30:A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85(5):365-76.

共引文献498

同被引文献8

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部