彩超对甲状腺癌的诊断价值研究

目的:探讨彩超对甲状腺癌的诊断价值。方法:本次研究选择2014年1月-2016年6月于我院收治的甲状腺癌患者103例,按照1:1的分配比例进行分组,分为第一组51例接受CT检查,第二组52例接受彩超检查,比较彩超、CT诊断结果和病理检查结果,了解两种检查的诊出率和漏诊率。结果:第二组彩超诊断结果符合率为84.62%,第一组CT诊断结果符合率为74.51%,对比两组诊断结果符合率,具有明显的统计学意义(P<0.05)。第二组彩超漏诊7例,漏诊率为1 3.46%,第一组CT漏诊13例,漏诊率为25.49%,第二组漏诊率低于第一组,对比两组漏诊率,具有明显的统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:彩超在甲状腺癌的诊断价值优于CT的诊断价值,其临床诊断价值较高,可推广。

Objective： to study the diagnosis value of color Doppler ultrasonography in thyroid carcinoma. Methods： this study from January 2014--June 2016 on hospital treated 103 patients with thyroid cancer, divided into the first group of 51 patients received CT examination, the second group of 52 patients received ultrasound, learn two consultation rate and the rate of misdiagnosis. Result： the second set of results of color Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis rate 84.62%, the first group of CT diagnosis rate 74.51% （P〈0.05）. Sec- ond group of color Doppler ultrasound in 7 cases of misdiagnosis, misdiagnosis rate of 13.46%, the first group of CT misdiagnosis of 13 cases, misdiagnosis rate was 25.49%, the second group misdiagnosis rate was lower than the first group, （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： the diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasonography in thyroid cancer is superior to the diagnostic value of CT and its clinical diagnos- tic value and can be applied.