期刊文献+

风险敏感理论:需要驱动风险决策 被引量:13

Risk-sensitivity theory: Need motivates risky decision-making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 风险敏感理论由研究动物觅食行为发展而来,提出有机体在有需要的状况下会出现从风险规避到风险寻求的行为,是风险决策领域内的一种生物学理论。目前风险敏感理论所做出的预测在动物和人类身上都获得了大量实证研究的支持,表明该理论可以解释很多领域中的风险决策。因此有必要对这一理论做一个系统的论述,包括对其理论来源和数学模型的发展演变进行梳理;从参照点等不同的角度分析该理论与其他决策理论的区别;并且,风险敏感理论也为经济不平等和权力等外部因素下的风险转移提供了解释,对已有研究做出了独特的贡献。 Risk-sensitivity theory, which is based on experimental examination of the foraging behavior of animals, proposes that decision makers shift from risk aversion to risk preference in situations of need. As a biological theory of decision making, predications based on risk sensitivity theory has been supported by both animal studies and studies involve human participants. Existing evidence suggests that risk-sensitivity theory can account for various patterns of decision-making in a wide range of domains. It's necessary to provide a systematic review of risk-sensitivity theory, incluoing its theoretical speculation, main arguments, and development of mathematical models. Distinctions among risk sensitivity theory and other well- established theories were also speculated in consideration of the reference point. Risk-sensitivity theory contributes to the literature as it provides additional explanations for shifts in individuals' risk taking tendencies under a wide range of situational factors, including changes in economic inequality and power.
作者 宋云嫱 徐瑞珩 邢采 SONG Yunqiang XU Ruiheng XING Cai(Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期486-499,共14页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(31200788) 中国人民大学科学研究基金面上项目(2112015065)资助
关键词 风险敏感理论 需要 参照点 经济不平等 权力 Risk-sensitivity theory need reference point economic inequality power
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1朱华燕,郑全全.MAU程序和自由讨论的群体决策质量比较[J].心理学报,2001,33(6):552-557. 被引量:6
  • 2何贵兵,梁社红,刘剑.风险偏好预测中的性别差异和框架效应[J].应用心理学,2002,8(4):19-23. 被引量:47
  • 3郑全全,郑波,郑锡宁,许跃进.多决策方法多交流方式的群体决策比较[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):246-252. 被引量:11
  • 4何贵兵,于永菊.决策过程中参照点效应研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):408-412. 被引量:44
  • 5Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axioms de l'ecole arnericaine [Rational man's behavior in face of risk: Critique of the American School's postulates and axioms]. Econometrica, 21,503-546.
  • 6Baillargeon, R. (2002). The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy: a summary in eight lessons. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp. 47-83). Malden, MA, US: Blackwell Publishers.
  • 7Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (Fourth ed.). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Comentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperiales Petropolitanae, 5, 175-192. (Trans. by L. Sommer in Econometrica, 1954, 22, 23-36.).
  • 9Birnbaum, M. H. (2005). Three new tests of independence that differentiate models of risky decision making. Management Science, 51, 1346-1358.
  • 10Birnbaum, M. H., & Navarrete, J. B. (1998). Testing descriptive utility theories: Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17, 49-78.

共引文献106

同被引文献210

引证文献13

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部