经鼻间歇性正压通气对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效评价被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的:对比分析经鼻间歇性正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续正压通气(NCPAP)对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的疗效情况。方法:应用随机数字表将我院78例NRDS患儿随机分为对照组39例及实验组39例,分别应用NCPAP及NIPPV;对比两组动脉血气分析情况及并发症发生率。结果:治疗12h后,实验组患儿的pH值、PaO2、PaCO2均优于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组并发症发生率为17.95%,明显低于对照组46.15%(P<0.05)。结论:与NCPAP相比,采用NIPPV治疗NRDS患儿的疗效及安全性更佳。

作者旷粮芬

机构地区湖南省湘乡市妇幼保健院

出处《中国农村卫生》 2016年第08X期89-89,共1页

关键词新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征经鼻间歇性正压通气经鼻持续正压通气

分类号 R722.1 [医药卫生—儿科]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1周家仍.固尔舒、珂立苏联合经鼻间歇正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较[J].医学综述,2013,19(24):4597-4599. 被引量：8
2陈信,彭万胜,王磊,徐家丽,董淮富,潘家华.经鼻间歇正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机对照研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2013,15(9):713-717. 被引量：30
3刘丽芳,李晓东,蔡琳,谢艳艳,许茜.经鼻间歇正压通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效分析[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2013,28(2):96-98. 被引量：43

二级参考文献38

1邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:872.
2Kirchner L,Weninger M,Unterasinger L,et al. Is the use of early nasal CPAP associated with lower rates of chronic lung disease and retinopathy of prematurity? Nine years of experience with the Vermont Oxford Neonatal Network. J Perinat Med,2005, 33 : 60- 66.
3Lampland AL, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, et al. Gas exchange and lung inflammation using nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in piglets with saline lavage-induced lung injury:an observational study. Crit Care Med ,2008, 36 : 183-187.
4Owen LS, Morley C J, Davis PG. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: a survey of practice in England. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2008, 93: F148-150.
5Owen LS, Morley C J, Davis PG. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation:what do we know in 20077 Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2007, 92: F414-418.
6Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, et al. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr, 2007, 150:521-526.
7Bhandari V, Gavino RG, Nedrelow JH, Pallela P, SalvadorA, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS[J]. J Perinatol, 2007, 27 (11): 697-703.
8Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study[J]. J Pediatr, 2007, 150(5): 521-526.
9Sai Sunil Kishore M, Dutta S, Kumar P. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2009, 98(9): 1412-1415.
10Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-1I and SNAPPE-II: simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores[J]. J Pediatr, 2001, 138(1): 92-100.