2Nynke Smidt, Jonathan Deeks, Theresa Moore. Guide to the contents of a Cochrane review and protocol for Dignostic Test Accuracy version 1. 0. 1 (updated February 2008 ) [ DB/OL]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. http ://strd- ta. cochrane, org/en/authors, html.
3Whiting P, Rutjes A, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS:a tool for the quality assessment of studies of di- agnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews [ J ]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2003 ,3 :25.
4Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAives MS, et al. Diagnostic ac-curacy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast bancer [ J ]. Radiology,2004,233 (3) : 830 - 849.
5Oztilker T, Oziilker F, Ozpacaci T, et al. The efficacy of 99mTc-MIBI scintimammography in the evaluation of breast lesions and axillary involvement: a comparison with X-rays mammography, uhrasonography and magnetic resonance im- aging[J]. Hell J Nuel Med,2010,13(2) :144 - 149.
6Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, et al. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with X-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound [ J ]. Invest Radiol,2009,44 (7) :412 - 421.
7Vassiou K, Kanavou T, Vlychou M, et al. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological andkinetic analysis:Comparison with conventional mammogra- phy and high-resolution ultrasound[ J]. Eur J Radiol,2009, 70(1) :69 -76.
8Hooley RJ,Andrejeva L, Scoutt LM. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging [ J ]. Ultrasound Q, 2011,27 (1) :23 -47.
9Liberman L, Mene11 JH. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) [ J ]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2002,40 (3) :409 -430.
