期刊文献+

肺移植患者术后生命质量及其影响因素研究 被引量:10

Research in quality of life in patients after lung transplantation and its related factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解肺移植患者术后的生命质量及其影响因素.方法 应用方便抽样,采用36条目简明健康调查量表(SF-36)、呼吸道疾病问卷(AQ20-R)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和医学应对问卷(MCMQ)对30例肺移植术后患者进行调查.采用SPSS 20.0软件进行统计学分析,用Pearson线性相关进行关联性分析,多重线性回归进行多因素分析.结果 肺移植患者术后SF-36各维度得分为(34.48±16.73)^(71.63±22.83)分,除精神健康外得分均小于常模(Z=-9.684^-2.817,P〈0.01),其中躯体疼痛得分最高为(71.63±22.83)分,生理功能得分最低为(34.48±16.73)分;AQ20-R总分的均分为(7.93±5.21)分,影响肺移植患者术后生命质量的前2个呼吸相关问题分别是"因为暴露于强烈的气味、烟雾或香水味而感到肺部不适""在感冒后因肺部疾病感到精疲力竭";SAS及SDS得分分别为(44.33±9.33)、(48.05±9.80)分,高于常模的(33.80±5.90)、(41.88±10.57)分,差异有统计学意义(t=6.1833、3.4458,P〈0.01);MCMQ的面对、回避、屈服各维度得分分别为(8.93±2.08)、(16.10±2.28)、(3.63±1.33)分,与常模的得分(19.48±3.81)、(14.44±2.97)、(8.81±3.17)分比较,差异有统计学意义(t=-27.7281、3.9885、-21.3878,P〈0.01).焦虑、抑郁、医学应对方式采用屈服应对是影响肺移植患者术后生命质量的主要因素.结论 肺移植患者术后生命质量最差的方面是生理职能,最好的方面是躯体疼痛;肺移植患者术后生命质量基本比一般人群差.肺移植患者术后生命质量可能的影响因素有焦虑、抑郁、屈服应对.  Objective To acknowledge the quality of life (QOL) in patients after lung transplantation and to explore related factors. Methods A cross- sectional study design and a convenience sampling were performed in this research. Totally 30 patients after lung transplantation were investigated. The questionnaires which used to explore the quality of life were Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaires (SF-36) and Revised Airways Questionnaires 20 (AQ20-R). Related state were surveyed by questionnaires consisted of demographic questionnaires, Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Medical Coping Mode Questionnaires (MCMQ). Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 20.0 software. Correlation analysis and multivariate analysis were performed using Pearson linear correlation analysis and multi-linear regression. Results The scores among the 8 dimensions of SF-36 were(34.48±16.73)-( 71.63±22.83), lower than those of norms(Z=-9.684--2.817, P〈0.05 or 0.01). Somatic pain scored the highest (71.63±22.83), while physiological function scored the lowest (34.48±16.73). The mean score of AQ20-R was 7.93±5.21. The major two problems that manifested QOL were: "uncomfortable feeling of lung caused by strong scent, smog or perfume", "exhausted feeling after having a cold". The mean scores of SAS and SDS were 44.33±9.33,48.05±9.80, higher than those of norms, which were 33.80 ± 5.90, 41.88 ± 10.57 (t=6.1833, 3.4458, P 〈 0.01). The scores among the 3 dimensions of MCMQ were 8.93 ± 2.08, 16.10 ± 2.28, 3.63 ± 1.33 and the differences were significant in 3 dimensions compared with those norms, which were 19.48±3.81, 14.44±2.97, 8.81±3.17(t=-27.7281, 3.9885,-21.3878, P〈0.01). Conclusions In SF-36, role-physical of patients after lung transplantation was the worst dimension, while bodily pain was the best dimension of QOL. The QOL of patients after lung transplantation were almost worse than normal people. The related factors of QOL in patients after lung transplantation maybe:anxiety, depression and medical coping style.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2017年第6期428-432,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金 广东省医学科研基金(A2013264) 广州市医药卫生科技项目(20131A010026)
关键词 肺移植 生活质量 焦虑 抑郁 应对方式 Lung transplantation Quality of life Anxiety Depression Coping style
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献69

  • 1吴雪,魏冬.血透患者家庭护理提供者生活质量及相关因素研究[J].护理学杂志,2005,20(1):6-8. 被引量:20
  • 2刘君,崔飞,蔡瑞军,何建行.纤维支气管镜在肺移植术后管理中的应用[J].第一军医大学学报,2005,25(12):1543-1545. 被引量:4
  • 3施建新,高成新,秦元,胡定中,曹克坚,杨骏.7例序贯式双肺移植临床总结[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2006,22(3):169-170. 被引量:5
  • 4国家统计局人口与就业司.中国人口统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1997.4-6.
  • 5Campbell A.Ten quality of American life:Perceptions evaluations and satis tactions.In:Campbell A,Converse PE,Rodagers WL.Ten quality of Ameri can life.New York:Rnssell Sage Foundation,1976.111-131.
  • 6Gurklis JA,Menke EM.Chronic hemodialysis patients perception of stress,coping and social support.ANNA J,1995,22(4):381-387.
  • 7Flaherty MJ,O'Brien ME.Family styles of coping in end stage renal disease.ANNA J,1992,19:345-350.
  • 8姜格宁.肺移植[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社.2008.3-13.
  • 9Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 10Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.

共引文献4062

同被引文献63

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部