期刊文献+

An Adaptive Traffic Distribution Scheme for CMT based on Lotka-Volterra Model in Multihomed Networks 被引量:1

An Adaptive Traffic Distribution Scheme for CMT based on Lotka-Volterra Model in Multihomed Networks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 CMT(concurrent multipath transfer) can increase throughput and transmission efficiency in multihomed networks. However, it is still an important challenge about distributing traffic adaptively into multiple access networks. Based on LV(Lotka.Volterra) model, we propose an adaptive traffic distribution scheme. In the scheme, two competition modes are concluded, multiple S.D(source.destination) streams competition for bandwidth of one path and multipath competition for traffic between each multihomed S.D host pair. Actually, each access network can establish a path for S.D pairs. So, in the first mode, each path is analogous to a predator, and overall traffic in a multihomed host is analogous to prey. Then, each path has to compete for the traffic by path information, e.g., bandwidth and congestion level. In the other one, if several S.D pairs pass through a shared path simultaneously, they will compete for bandwidth of the path. Here, each S.D pair is analogous to a predator, and the bandwidth of the common path is analogous to the prey. At last, compared with other three schemes, uniform traffic distribution, greedy path selection, random path selection in OPNET simulator, the proposed scheme can perform better onreducing file transmission time and increasing network throughput in FTP service. CMT (concurrent multipath trans- fer) can increase throughput and transmission efficiency in multihomed networks. However, it is still an important challenge about distributing traffic adaptively into multiple access networks. Based on LV (Lotka-Volterra) model, we propose an adaptive traffic distribution scheme. In the scheme, two com- petition modes are concluded, multiple S-D (source-destination) streams competition for bandwidth of one path and multipath competi- tion for traffic between each multihomed S-D host pair. Actually, each access network can establish a path for S-D pairs. So, in the first mode, each path is analogous to a predator, and overall traffic in a multihomed host is analogous to prey. Then, each path has to com- pete for the traffic by path information, e.g., bandwidth and congestion level. In the other one, if several S-D pairs pass through a shared path simultaneously, they will compete for bandwidth of the path. Here, each S-D pair is analogous to a predator, and the bandwidth of the common path is analogous to the prey. At last, compared with other three schemes, uniform traffic distribution, greedy path selection, random path selection in OPNET simulator, the proposed scheme can perform better on reducing file transmission time and increasing network throughput in FTP service.
出处 《China Communications》 SCIE CSCD 2017年第2期79-89,共11页 中国通信(英文版)
基金 supported by National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB315905) National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 60932005, 61172048, 61100184, 61201128) National High-tech R&D Program (Grant No. 2013AA01A209)
关键词 multihomed networks LOTKA-VOLTERRA CMT MULTIPATH BIO-INSPIRED multihomed networks lotka-volt-erra cmt multipath bio-inspired
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1Yong Cui, Hongyi Wang, Xiuzhen Cheng, Dan Li, and A. Yla-Jaaski. Dynamic Scheduling for Wireless Data Center Networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (IEEE TPDS), 24(12):2365-2374,2013.
  • 2D. Wischik, C. Raiciu, A. Greenhalgh, and M. Handley. Design, implementation and evaluation of congestion control for multipath TCP. In Proc. of the 8th USENIX conference on Networked systems design and implementation, pages 8-8. USENIX Association, 2011.
  • 3Michael Abd-El-Malek, William V Courtright II, Chuck Cranor, Gregory R Ganger, James Hendricks, Andrew J Klosterman, Michael P Mesnier, Manish Prasad, Brandon Salmon, Raja R Sambasivan, et al. Ursa Minor: Versatile Cluster-based Storage. In FAST, volume 5, page 163, 2005.
  • 4Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat. MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM, 51 (1): 1 07- 113,2008.
  • 5C Raiciu, M Handley, and D Wischik. Coupled congestion control for multipath transport protocols. RFC 6356, oct; 2011.
  • 6Yan Zhang and Nirwan Ansari. On mitigating TCP incast in data center networks. In Proceedings of INFO COM, pages 51-55. IEEE, 2011.
  • 7Alexander Shpiner, Isaac Keslassy, Gabi Bracha, Eyal Dagan, Ofer Iny, and Eyal Soha. A switchbased approach to throughput collapse and starvation in data centers. Computer Networks, 2012.
  • 8Mohammad Alizadeh, Albert Greenberg, David A Maltz, Jitendra Padhye, Parveen Patel, Balaji Prabhakar, Sudipta Sengupta, and Murari Sridharan. Data center TCP (DCTCP). ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4):63-74, 2010.
  • 9Tanmoy Das and Krishna M Sivalingam. TCP improvements for data center networks. In the Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), pages 1-10. IEEE, 2013.
  • 10Adrian S-W Tam, Kang Xi, Yang Xu, and H Jonathan Chao. Preventing TCP incast throughput collapse at the initiation, continuation, and termination. In Proceedings of the 2072 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Quality of Service, page 29. IEEE Press, 2012.

共引文献8

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部