新兴权利确认:司法路径的正当性阐释

Confirmation of Emerging Right: Reasonable Interpretation of the Judicial Path

新兴权利的法律确认既是法律的权利本位理念的应然要求,也是不断涌现的新兴权利事实和案件的现实需要。在确认路径上,立法机制所固有的滞后性、不周延性和不合目的性等缺陷决定了通过立法及时、有效地确立新兴权利的限度和困境,而司法作为权威的纠纷解决机制、利益的个别调整机制和个案正义的再分配机制,则能有效化解或避免立法确认路径的短板,并在新兴权利确认上展现出较强的现实优势。从现代司法的理念及其运作看,权利主体在宪政意义上的司法救济权以及现代司法不得拒绝裁判的法治原则,均应然地赋予了司法确认新兴权利的价值使命。从新兴权利本身的生成特质及其规律看,新兴权利的动态生成过程要求通过司法救济来确立新兴法益,并通过司法的救济式确立为新兴法定权利的立法确认奠定条件和基础。

The legal confirmation of emerging fight is the basic requirement of the power standard conception and realistic request of in- creasingly emerging fact and cases related to emerging rights. During this process, legislative mechanism has the defaults of inherent hysteretic quality, not comprehensive nature and does not conform to purpose. It determines limits and dilemma of confirming emerging fight timely and effectively through legislation. However, legislation obtains the mechanism of solving dispute, adjusting benefits indi- vidually and reallocating individual case and justice. It resolves and avoids defaults of legislative confirmation and shows strong advan- tages on confirmation of emerging right. From the concept and application of modern justice, Judicial remedy of the subject of fight and legal principles of not refusing are endowed the value of mission which are emerging fight confirmed by administration of justice. From the quality and rules of emerging right, its dynamic formation establishes emerging legal interests and create condition and basis through judicial remedy.