摘要
从存在论上,萨特将责任看作是人的绝对自由的逻辑要求,海德格尔将责任看作是此在生存的一种"缺欠"所致,其目的都是消除人与责任之间的外在关系。马克思从人的现实性出发,强调技术的社会责任在于人的解放和全面发展,强调人对自然的责任关系。在当今社会发展中技术具有生态使命,目的是要探索人与自然之生态关系的生态阈值,以此科学地寻求人与自然环境之间的适度关系。在生态问题上,盲目的保护与盲目的开发一样,都不是生态文明建设的本质要求。
From the ontology, Sartre regards responsibility as a logical requirement of absolute freedom, Heidegger regards responsibility as the dasein of a "missing", its purpose is to eliminate the external relationship between people and responsibility. Starting from the reality of people, Marx emphasizes the social responsibility of technology lies in the people~ liberation and all - round development, emphasizing the responsibility of the people on the natural relationship. Technology with ecological mission in today~ society development, the purpose is to explore the ecological thresholds between man and nature ecological threshold, in order to look for the moderate relationship between human beings and natural environment. On the ecological problems, the pro- tection of the blind and blind development, is not the basic requirement of ecological civilization construction.
作者
许斗斗
XU Dou - dou(School of Philosophy and Social Development, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021 ,China)
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期51-56,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
福建省社科基地重大项目"唯物史观与重建社会生活研究"
关键词
马克思
海德格尔
技术
社会责任
生态责任
Marx
Heidegger
technology
social responsibility
ecological responsibility