中国古典舞学科建设综论(续编上)

Review on the Discipline Construction of Chinese Classical Dance

本文为《学科建设视野中的中国古典舞》(上、中、下)的续编。其针对性仍如此前对"中国古典舞"这一学科、这一名词内涵的把握。笔者在全面梳理迄今为止的学科建设历程后,提出今后中国古典舞建设在若干方面的重要修为,主要有:一、应该开展中国古典舞"基本范畴"和"概念丛"的学术研究,这对于六十余年中国古典舞的学科建设是瓜熟蒂落、水到渠成。二、应该抓紧中国古典舞"代表作"的甄别和撷取,但作为学科建设,我们目前只需在"舞台表演艺术"领域的已然成果中进行。三、应该立即组建相应机构,开展中国古典舞学科建设谱系的学术研究。四、应该建立一种中国古典舞教学建设的"自洽"机制,贯彻学科奠基者和持续建构者李正一先生的学术理念——特别是她所主张的中国古典舞教学要有一个"统一的主体"(也即基训、身韵"合二为一"的问题),以及"扩张对传统的继承"的理念。五,应该实事求是地、恰如其分地、切实可行地做一些学科建设的比较,目前最合适的无过于"中国古典舞"和"汉唐古典舞"的比较。

The paper, based on the general review on the development of the discipline construction of Chinese Classical Dance, puts forward several proposals mainly including the followings. First, it is expected to do academic research on the ＂basic category＂ and the ＂concepts clusters＂ of Chinese Classical Dance, which is the natural result of the 60-year development of Chinese Classical Dance; second, it is supposed to determine and select the ＂representative works＂ of Chinese Classical Dance among the existing repertoire as stage performing arts; third, the corresponding institutions should be established to start research on the genealogy of Chinese Classical Dance; fourth, the mechanism of self-consistence should be built to implement the ideas of ＂expanding the inheritance of tradition＂ and ＂unified main body＂, combining the basic techniques training and body rhythm, which is advocated by Li Zhengyi, the discipline founder and constructor of Chinese Classical Dance. Last, it is necessary to make some operable and suitable comparisons and contrasts between different disciplines like ＂Chinese Classical Dance＂ and ＂Han and Tang Dynasties Classical Dance＂.