单篇论著影响力评价指标比较分析--学术迹与Altmetrics评分、F1000评分、Comment的比较

Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Indexes of Single Publication Influence

[目的/意义]比较单篇论著学术迹与Altmetrics评分、F1000、Comment论文数等不同影响力评价指标的评价效果。[方法/过程]选取医学信息学和糖尿病两个主题样本文献,查询2012年发表文章的被引频次、Altmetrics评分、F1000评分、Comment文章数和期刊5IF,并根据相应参数计算学术迹。采用Spearman检验分析各指标的相关性。[结果/结论]检索到2012年正式发表被F1000推荐且有评论性文章的医学信息学主题文献57篇,糖尿病主题文献60篇。两个样本文章的学术迹与Altmetrics评分和Comment论文数有相关性,与F1000评分无相关性。单篇论著影响力各评价指标都具有一定意义,各自侧重点不同,相互独立与补充却不可替代。

[ Purpose/significance ] This paper aims to compare the evaluation effects of academic trace and Ahmetrics score, FIO00 score, quantity of Comment papers for single publication. [ Method/process ]Published articles about medical informatics and diabetes mellitus in 2012 are retrieved in PubMed. Altmetrics score, F1000 score, total citation, Comment numbers and 5 year impact factor （SIF） are extracted. The paper examines the correlation of indicators by Spearman rank correlation analysis. [ Result/conclusion ] 57 articles about medical informatics and 60 articles about diabetes mellitus were published, recommended by F1000 and commented in 2012. The academic traces of the samples are correlated to the Altmetrics score and the number of comment papers, but have no correlation with the F1000 score. All the indicators of single publication influence are significant, independent and complementary to each other with different emphases.