期刊文献+

EPR与CPR1000核电厂1级部件制造与安装水压试验差异研究 被引量:3

Research on the Differences of Hydrostatic Test for Class 1 Components of EPR and CPR1000 Nuclear Power Plants in the Phases of Manufacturing and Installations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1级部件制造与安装阶段的水压试验是核电机组后续调试与安全运行的重要前提。对比分析了不同版本法国《压水堆核岛机械设备设计和建造规则》(RCC-M)关于水压试验要求的差异,并结合CPR1000和EPR 2种机组的系统和结构特点,对1级部件在制造、安装阶段水压试验的试验压力和试验边界等差异进行了论述,并探讨了EPR机组1级部件在制造与安装阶段水压试验的压力选取方法,所得结果可为EPR机组制造与安装阶段的水压试验工作提供重要参考。 The hydrostatic test for Class 1 components in the phases of manufacturing and installations is a critical pre-requirement for subsequent commissioning and secure operations. The discrepancies of the requirements for hydrostatic testing are compared and analyzed between the different versions of French standard of Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of PWR Nuclear Islands (RCC-M). Taking account of the characteristics of the system and structure of CPR1000 and EPR reactors, the differences of test pressure and test boundaries of hydrostatic test for Class 1 components in the manufacture and the installation phases are presented. The method on how to select test pressure for EPR Class 1 components in the manufacture and the installation phases is also explored and discussed. The conclusions can provide important reference for hydrostatic tests for EPR reactors.
出处 《中国电力》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期92-95,100,共5页 Electric Power
关键词 核电机组 EPR CPR1000 水压试验 试验压力 试验边界 nuclear power plant EPR CPR1000 hydrostatic test test pressure test boundary
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1European utility requirements for LWR nuclear power plants[S],2001.
  • 2Taishan Nuclear Power Plant Preliminary Safety Analysis Report[R].Taishan Nuclear Power Company Ltd.,2008.
  • 3U.S.EPR Final Safety Analysis Report[R].AREVA NP Inc,2007.
  • 4林继铭,欧阳勇,葛珍珍.阳江核电厂工程严重事故对策报告[R].深圳:深圳中广核工程设计有限公司,2008.
  • 5阳江核电厂3、4号机组初步安全分析报告[R].阳江核电有限公司,2009.
  • 6国核安函(2007)28号,关于印发《第二代改进型核电项目核安全审评原则》的通知[S].

共引文献8

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部