摘要
目的研究在急诊危重患者抢救过程中采取全程护理服务措施的影响。方法选取我院于2014年1月至2014年12月采取常规急救流程措施和护理模式的448例危重患者作为对照组,另选取于2015年1月至2015年12月采取全程护理服务的448例危重患者作为干预组。比较两组患者的满意度、一次抢救成功率以及临床护理服务质量评分。结果干预组的满意度为95.98%,显著高于对照组的83.93%(P<0.05)。干预组的一次抢救成功率为91.96%,显著高于对照组的80.58%(P<0.05)。干预组患者的各项临床护理服务质量评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在急诊危重患者抢救过程中采取全程护理服务措施,患者的满意度、临床护理服务质量评分和一次抢救成功率均较高,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To study the effect of whole course nursing measures in emergency rescue of critical patients. Methods 448 cases of critical patients receiving conventional emergency treatment and nursing mode in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2014 were selected as control group, and another 448 cases of critical patients receiving whole course nursing from January 2015 to December 2015 were selected as intervention group. The satisfaction degree, success rate of one-time rescue and clinical nursing quality scores were compared between two groups. Results The satisfaction degree of intervention group was 95.98%, significantly higher than 83.93% of control group (P〈0.05). The success rate of one-time rescue of intervention group was 91.96%, significantly higher than 80.58% of control group (P 〈0.05). The clinical nursing quality scores of intervention group were significantly higher than those of control group (P 〈0.05). Conclusions Whole course nursing measures in emergency rescue of critical patients have higher satisfaction degree, higher clinical nursing quality score and higher success rate of one-time rescue, which are worthy of clinical promotion and application.
出处
《临床医学工程》
2017年第3期405-406,共2页
Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词
全程护理
急诊
危重患者
Whole course nursing
Emergency
Critical patients