期刊文献+

参蛤青龙丸治疗支气管哮喘寒哮证的非劣效性随机对照试验 被引量:6

Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trials of Modified Shenge Qinglong Wan( 参蛤青龙丸) in Treating Bronchial Asthma with Wheezing Due to Cold Syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察参蛤青龙丸治疗支气管哮喘寒哮证的临床疗效。方法采用随机对照、第三方评价的临床试验设计,纳入1~3级支气管哮喘急性发作期及慢性持续期寒哮证患者129例,随机分为中药组65例,西药组64例。中药组采用参蛤青龙丸治疗,西药组吸入沙美特罗替卡松气雾剂50μg,每日2次,两组疗程均为12周。分别于治疗前和治疗后4、8、12周进行哮喘控制(ACT)评分评测,分别于治疗前后评测肺功能,结果均采用意向性分析(ITT)和符合方案集分析(PP),ACT评分采用可信区间法进行非劣效性判定。结果 ITT分析与PP分析均显示,治疗4、8、12周时两组ACT评分的95%可信区间下限均>-1.5,提示中药组均不劣效于西药组。治疗后中药组的50%呼气峰流速(FEF_(50))和西药组的第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、FEF50与本组治疗前比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗后两组间肺功能各项指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论参蛤青龙丸治疗1~3级支气管哮喘寒哮证患者的ACT评分不劣效于沙美特罗替卡松气雾剂,两者亦可不同程度地改善肺功能。 Objective To observe the clinical effect of modified Shenge Qinglong Wan (参蛤青龙丸) in treating bronchial asthma with wheezing due to cold syndrome. Methods With randomly control and the third party evaluation design, the study included 129 patients with acute and chronic bronchial asthma with wheezing due to cold syndrome (class I-class III), which were randomly allocated into Chinese medicine group (65 cases) and western medicine group (64 cases). In the Chinese medicine group, the patients were treated with modified Shenge Qinglong Wan (参蛤青龙丸), while in the western medicine group, the patients were treated with the salmeterol/flutieasone aerosol (50 μg, twice per day). The course of treatment lasted for 12 weeks. , The asthma control test (ACT) scores were measured at baseline, and 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after treatment, and the lung function was evaluated before and after treatment. The results were analyzed by intention-to-treatment and per-protocol analyses. Confidence interval was used to determine whether ACT scores were non-inferior or not. Results Both ITT and PP analyses showed that, at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after treatment, the 95% CI lower limits of ACT scores were greater than - 1.5, suggesting Chinese medicine group being non-inferior to western medicine group. In Chinese medicine group, there was significant difference in 50% forced expiratory flow (FEFS0) between before and after treatment (P 〈 0. 05 ). In western medicine group, there were significant difference in forced vital capacity ( FEV1 ) and FEF50 between before and after treatment (P 〈 0. 05 ). After treatment, there were no significant differences in the lung function measures between the groups (P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion In patients with bronchial asthma with wheezing due to cold syndrome (class I -class III ) , ACT scores in the modified Shenge Qinglong Wan group are non-inferior to those in the salmeterol/flutieasone aerosol group. Both therapies could improve lung function with varying degrees.
出处 《中医杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期489-492,共4页 Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家中医临床研究基地业务建设第二批科研专项(JDZX2015199) 广州市科技计划项目(2010U1-E00801) 广东省中医院中医药科学技术研究专项(YN2015MS16 YN2014PJ02)
关键词 支气管哮喘 寒哮证 参蛤青龙丸 哮喘控制评分 非劣效试验 随机对照试验 bronchial asthma wheezing due to cold syndrome Shenge Qinglong Wan asthma control test (ACT) scores non-inferiority randomized controlled trials
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1沈自尹.中西医结合防治支气管哮喘 支气管哮喘的中西医结合防与治[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1993,13(5):296-297. 被引量:18
  • 2高锦团.雷公藤多甙治疗激素依赖型阿斯匹林性哮喘36例[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1994,14(12):727-729. 被引量:14
  • 3宓穗卿,李杰芬.寻找应用于治疗哮喘病的汉方药柴朴汤中的生物活性成分[J].中药新药与临床药理,1994,5(4):51-55. 被引量:14
  • 4倪伟,张惠勇,吴银根.咳喘落治疗支气管哮喘寒哮证多中心临床研究[J].上海中医药大学学报,2007,21(3):43-45. 被引量:13
  • 51非劣效性/等效性界值 从临床上讲,一种新药的药效不比标准对照药差,到底临床上可接受的最大允许的范围是多少
  • 62.1检验假设的构建和检验用统计量无效假设(nullhypotheses)和备选假设(alternativehypotheses)分别用H0和Ha表示。以α作为总的检验水准。表1列举了几种不同情形下的检验假设和检验统计量计算的通用公式。
  • 72.2结论的推断
  • 82.2.1非劣效性试验由于只进行一次单侧检验(one_sidedtest),若P≤α,则H0被拒绝,可推论T非劣效于S;若P>α,则还不能下非劣效的结论。这里的α含义是,当T比S疗效差,其效应差值实际上超过δ时,错误地下T非劣效于S结论的概率。
  • 92.2.2等效性试验由于需要在两个方向上同时进行两次单侧检验(twoone_sidedtests),故亦需分别推断。若P1≤α/2和P2≤α/2同时成立(注意每次检验的水准只用总的检验水准α的一半),则两个无效假设均被拒绝,前者推论T不比S差,后者推论T不比S好,因此综合的推断是T和S具有等效性;若P1和P2中的任何一个大于α/2,则不可下等效的结论。这里的α含义是,当T与S的疗效差值实际超过δ(包括差-δ以下或好δ以上两种情况)时,错误地下T和S等效结论的概率。
  • 102.2.3优效性试验有两种不同的情形。一种是严格意义上的,从统计学的角度考虑的优效性,这时所用的假设为通常的零假设,为单侧检验。目前临床试验中一般用此概念。如果能拒绝无效假设,可下统计学意义上优效的结论。当然这种优效性较弱,有时可看作是边缘优效性。

共引文献613

同被引文献37

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部