暂予监外执行的实践图景与改革方向被引量：6

Practical View and Reform Direction of Temporary Execution Outside Prison

下载PDF

导出

摘要 2012年修改后的《刑事诉讼法》《监狱法》对暂予监外执行制度进行了修改和完善。十八大以后国家出台了一系列暂予监外执行审批和监管的重要文件,纠正了一大批不当暂予监外执行的情况。执法实践中,保外就医在暂予监外执行中占有较大比重,非法保外就医现象突出,检察监督的效果不理想。暂予监外执行制度的改革方向是推动法律法规统一化、执法信息公开化、执法流程信息化和执法标准规范化。 The Criminal Procedure Law and Prison Law amended in 2012 corrected and improved the temporary execution outside prison system, and a series of important law enforcement documents and judicial documents were enacted after the 18th National Congress of Communist Party of China to correct the undue temporary execution outside prison. In legal practice, parole for medical treatment takes a large proportion of temporary execution outside prison, and illegal parole for medical treatment is conspicuous accordingly. And the result of inspection and supervision is not satisfied too. For the purpose of reforming temporary execution outside prison system, the following four points should be completed with great efforts： unification of laws and regulations, publicity of law enforcement information, informationization of law enforcement process, standardization of law enforcement standards.

作者高一飞汪友海 GAO Yi-fei WANG You-hai(Faculty of Law, Southwest University of Political Science ＆ Law,Chongqing 401120, China)

机构地区西南政法大学法学院

出处《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》 CAS 2017年第2期70-79,共10页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基金国家社会科学基金重点项目"司法公开实施机制研究"(14AFX013) 最高人民法院重大理论课题"司法领域公民知情权研究"(2014sp010) 中国法学会"深入研究党的十八届四中全会精神"重点专项课题"司法公开实施状况评估和建议"(CLS(2015)ZDZX10)

关键词监外执行保外就医社区矫正检察监督 execution outside prison parole for medical treatment community correction inspection and supervision

分类号 D915.3 [政治法律—诉讼法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1高一飞.走向透明的中国司法——兼评中国司法公开改革[J].中州学刊,2012(6):60-64. 被引量：21

二级参考文献11

1张维辑.《最高院连续发文力推司法公开》,法制网,http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/index/content/2012-02/20/content_3362194.htm?node=20908.
2龙飞.《全国法院10月将开展“司法公开宣传月”活动》,新华网,http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2010-09/25/c_12601304.htm.
3ARTICLE19:The Public's Right to Know:Principles on Freedom of Information Legislation,ARTICLE 19,London,ISBN 1902598105,June 1999,http://www.article19.org/pdfs/stand-ards/righttoknow.pdf.1999-07-01.
4张吉喜.《刑事诉讼法中公正审判权:以〈公民权利和政治权利国际公约〉为基础》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2011年,第49-50页.
5The Madrid Principle on therelationship between the media and judicial independent.CJJL yearbook.Vol4(1995).
6张宽明.《敞开法治之窗维护司法权威--中国法院国际互联网开通五周年回眸》,中国法院网,http://www.china-court.org/public/detail.php?id=260469.
7韩丹东.《全国中级人民法院网站建有有效网站的情况》,法制网,http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/index/content/2012-02/20/content_3362200.htm?node=20908.
8张维.《法院网站建设落后于政府网站》,法制网,http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/index/content/2012-02/20/content_3362202.htm?node=20908.
9[奥]曼弗雷德.诺瓦克.《民权公约评注:联合国〈公民权利和政治权利国际公约〉》,毕小青等译,生活.读书.新知三联书店,2003年,第249页.
10Bommer,F.,“?ffentlichkeitder Hauptverhandlung zwischen Individualgrundrecht und rechtsstaatlich-demokratischem Strukturprinzip”,in Donatsch,A.,Forster,M.,andSchwarzenegger,C.(eds.),Strafrecht,Strafprozessrecht und Menschenr-echte:Festschrift für Stefan Trechsel(Zurich:Schulthess,2002),p672.