传统剥除术与腹腔镜下剥除术治疗子宫肌瘤临床效果比较

Comparison of Clinical Effects of Traditional Stripping and Laparoscopic Stripping in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

目的探究子宫肌瘤临床治疗中传统剥除术与腹腔镜下剥除术的治疗效果。方法选择我院2012年1月—2016年10月收治的53例子宫肌瘤患者作为研究对象。根据手术方法的不同分为对照组和观察组,分析比较两组患者手术治疗情况及临床疗效。结果观察组患者术中出血量(63.18±5.08)ml,术后排气时间(12.64±3.47)h,并发症发生率为7.41%,均低于对照组患者(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗总有效率为96.30%,高于对照组患者(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下剥除术为微创手术治疗,手术创伤小术后恢复快,有效提高子宫肌瘤患者的临床治疗效果,安全性好。

Objective To explore the curative effect of traditional and laparoscopic stripping in the treatment of uterine leiomyoma. Methods 53 cases of uterine leiomyoma were treated in our hospital from January 2012 to October 2016. According to the different operation methods, the patients were divided into control group and observation group. The operativetreatment and clinical curative effect of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results The bleeding volume in the observation group was（63.18 ± 5.08） ml, the postoperative time was（12.64 ± 3.47） h and the complication rate was 7.41%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group（P〈0.05）. The total effective rate was 96.30%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Laparoscopic microsurgery is a minimally invasive surgical procedure, which can improve the recovery of uterine leiomyoma after operation and improve the clinical curative effect and safety.