期刊文献+

黄道周《魁星图》考辨

A Discussion on Huang Daozhou's Kuixing Painting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 立足于晚明人物画风格的时代背景,运用图像分析法,文献研究法和对比分析法,对泉州市文物管理委员会所收藏的黄道周《魁星图》的真伪性进行深入探讨。从中发现《魁星图》的风格多与时代不符,与黄道周的个人风格存在差异,并在题款、题跋、印章、人物服饰存在诸多疑点,进而阐明了长期以来被认为是黄道周人物画代表作的《魁星图》并非是黄道周真迹,而是清中晚期假托黄道周之名的伪作。 This paper, based on the historical background of the style of figure painting in the late Ming dynasty, discusses the anthentieity of Huang Daozhou's Kuixing painting, displayed at the Cultural Relies Management Committee of Quanzhou City, with the method of image analysis, literature review and eontrastive analysis. The research shows that the style of the Kuixing doesn' t conform to his period' s and personal style, with some doubtful points in the inscription, preface, postseript, seat, and the eharaeter's eostume. This paper further points out that the Kuixing, which has long been considered one of Huang Daozhou's masterpieces, is not his authentie painting, but a forgery, under the veil of Huang Dhaozhou in the middle and late period of Qing Dynasty.
作者 蔡力杰
机构地区 青岛大学文学院
出处 《闽台文化研究》 2016年第4期61-69,共9页 Fujian-Taiwan Cultural Research
关键词 人物画 魁星 晚明 黄道周 粗笔写意 figure painting, Kuixing painting,late Ming Dynasty, Huang Daozhou, freehand brushwork paintings.
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

  • 1丘幼宣.“黄慎少学画于上官周”质疑[J].美术研究,1985(4):83-84. 被引量:2
  • 2郭英德.论历代《文选》类总集的分体归类[J].中国文化研究,2004(3):1-17. 被引量:6
  • 3余绍宋.书画书录解题[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2003:166.
  • 4[英]奥斯汀·哈灵顿.艺术与社会理论--美学中的社会学论争[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2010.
  • 5洪迈.夷坚志[M].北京:中华书局,1981..
  • 6葛兆光.中国思想史(第二卷)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2000..
  • 7顾炎武.日知录[M].兰州:甘肃民族出版社,1997..
  • 8吴自牧.梦粱录[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1980..
  • 9陆游.老学庵笔记[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
  • 10马国翰.玉函山房辑佚书[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1996.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部