期刊文献+

参照性交流双方学习和语言注意特征的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Performance and Language Attention Feature between Learners in the Learning Process of Referential Communication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究采用参照性交流学习范式,以大学生为被试,创设虚拟学习材料,通过对功能预测中学习双方成绩和语言的分析,探查比较参照性交流学习过程中双方学习成绩和选择性注意的特点。结果显示:(1)学习阶段1~2,高分组和低分组间成绩差异不显著,学习阶段3~10,高分组显著更高;高分组在学习阶段1~3成绩上升较快,学习阶段3~10表现出稳步上升特点,低分组在学习阶段1~5成绩上升缓慢,学习阶段6~10成绩无显著变化。(2)成绩组间语言描述的维度数量差异不显著;学习阶段3~6语言描述的维度数量存在变化性。结果表明:参照性交流学习过程中,学习双方学习成绩表现出不平衡性特点;学习双方选择性注意水平表现出一致性特点;学习者学习成绩和选择性注意的整体变化趋势具有一定的共同特点。 The study adopted the referential communication paradigm with college students as participants. Through the analysis of both performance and language of functional prediction task, it created virtual learning materials to explore the characteristics of both performance and selective attention in the process of referential communication. The results showed that: (1) There was not significant difference in the block 1 and 2 between the high and low grouping. The high grouping was significant higher in the block 3-10.The score of high grouping rose faster in the block 1-3 and steadily rose in the block 3-10. The low grouping rose slowly in the block 1-5 and no significant difference in the block 6-10. (2) The di- mensional number of language description did not appear significant difference between the high and low grouping. The dimensional number of language description changed in the block 3-6. The results suggested that: The score appeared imbalance between learners. The levels of selective attention appeared consisten- cy. The overall change trend between learning performance and selective attention had something in com- mon.
作者 张恒超
出处 《心理研究》 2017年第1期24-30,共7页 Psychological Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJC190029)
关键词 参照性交流 选择性注意 语言 referential communication selective attention language
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献124

  • 1沈德立,白学军.高效率学习的心理机制研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):2-6. 被引量:83
  • 2Bangerter,A.,&Clark,H.H.(2003).Navigating joint projects withdialogue.Cognitive Science,27(2),195-225.
  • 3Barr,D.J.,&Kronmuller,E.(2006).Conversation as a site ofcategory learning and category use.Psychology of Learning andMotivation,47,181-211.
  • 4Blair,M.,&Homa,D.L.(2005).Integrating novel dimensions toeliminate category exceptions:when more is less.Journal ofExperimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,31(2),258-271.
  • 5Brennan,S.E.,Chen,X.,Dickinson,C.A.,Neider,M.B.,&Zelinsky,G.J.(2008).Coordinating cognition:The costs andbenefits of shared gaze during collaborative search.Cognition,106(3),1465-1477.
  • 6Brown,Schmidt,S.(2009).Partner specific interpretation ofmaintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.Journal ofMemory and Language,in press.
  • 7Clark,H.H.(1996).Using language.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Clark,H.H.,&Krych,M.(2004).Speaking while monitoringaddressees for understanding.Journal of Memory and Language,50(1),62-81.
  • 9Corter,J.,&Gluck,M.(1992).Explaining basic categories:Featurepredictability and information.Psychological Bulletin,111(2),291-303.
  • 10Gentner,D.,&Kurtz,K.(2005).Relational categories.In W.K.Ahn.,R.L.,Goldstone.,B.C.Love.,A.B.Markman.,&P.W.Wolff.(Eds.),Categorization inside and outside the lab(pp.151-175).Washington,DC:APA.

共引文献52

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部