宋代鼎州记载之疑误考辨

The Study of the Doubts on the Records of Dingzhou in Song Dynasty

文献对宋代鼎州(朗州、常德府)沿革的记载,存在一些问题,如《续资治通鉴长编》将宋初朗州误作鼎州,《宋会要辑稿》以"府州"条记事羼入"常德府"条等。本文厘清了宋代鼎州的沿革与文献中关于鼎州的书写,进而探讨了相关联的书写源流、地名避讳等问题,指出《长编》误宋初朗州为鼎州,系因避讳而以后名追改前名;宋代官修《会要》系《皇宋十朝纲要》"要"部分的重要史源;《宋史·地理志》常德府条系宋朝不同时期《国史》的混书。

There are several mistakes in the documents of the evolution of Dingzhou in Song Dynasty.For instance,Xu Zizhitongjian Changbian wrongly recorded Langzhou as Dingzhou,Song Huiyao Jigao wrongly put Fuzhou＇s history into Changdefu records.This paper clarifies the evolution of Dingzhou in Song Dynasty as well as the writing about Dingzhou in the literature,and further discusses the source of writing,taboo names as well as other issues.We also point out that XuZizhi tongjianChangbian mistook Langzhou for Dingzhou since Song people changed the former name to the latter name.The main part of HuangSong Shichao Gangyao was based on Song Huiyao.And the writing of Changdefu in Songshi was the mixed writing of the National History in different periods of Song Dynasty.