期刊文献+

优势侧基底节区脑出血手术入路的选择 被引量:10

Approach to evacuate basal ganglia hematoma in dominant side
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨优势侧基底节区脑出血手术入路的不同对患者语言功能恢复的影响。方法纳入优势侧基底节区(包括累及额叶、颞叶及丘脑)血肿60例患者,根据中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查量表对31例经脑池-侧裂-岛叶入路和29例经颞中回皮层-岛叶入路患者术前、术后1和3个月进行失语症评分检查。结果手术前的各组分值均小于手术后评分,经过治疗后各组语言评分分值均有所提高,术后3个月各组语言评分分值较术后1个月均有提高。经脑池-侧裂-岛叶入路较经颞中回皮层-岛叶入路患者术后1个月(t=3.783,P<0.001)、术后3个月(t=9.365,P<0.001)语言功能都有提高,差异有统计学意义。结论优势侧基底节区脑出血经脑池-侧裂-岛叶入路的微创手术在不破坏颞叶皮层及语言中枢的情况下,可将手术创伤降至最低患者术后语言功能得到最大程度的恢复。 Objective To investigate language function recovery of the different approach to evacuate basal ganglia hematoma in dominant side. Methods A total of 60 patients of basal ganglia hematoma involved in frontal lobe, temporal lobe and thalamus in dominant side were enrolled. The hematoma in 31 cases was evacuated via the transsylvian approach, while in 29 cases via the transtemporal cortex approach. The lan guage function with Chinese Rehabilitation Research Center Standard Aphasia Examination (CRRCAE) before the surgery, 1 month and 3 months after surgery was evaluated. Results A total of 31 patients via transsylvian ap proach and 29 cases via transtemporal cortex approach were enrolled. The total scores and the average scores after the surgery were all increased significantly. The language score was increased gradually in 1st month and 3rd month after surgery. The total scores and the average scores of cases via transsylvian approach were all significantly increased on contrasted with which of the cases via transtemporal cortex approach ( t=3.783 and 9.365, P〈0.001). Conclusions There are significant advantages evacuating basal ganglia hematoma via the transsylyian approach, which is beneficial for lessening the injury in language cortex and recovery of language function.
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第5期59-62,共4页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 基底节 脑出血 显微手术 basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage micro-neurosurgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献51

  • 1李胜利.言语治疗学[M].北京:华夏出版社,2003.19-21.
  • 2Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders[M]. 2th Ed. Philadelphia: Le and Febiger,1983.1-2.
  • 3汤慈美 王新德.神经心理学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2001.254-270.
  • 4Michael T. Ullman. isI broca's area part of a basal ganglia thalamocortical circuit[J]. Cortex. 2006, 42: 480.
  • 5Brian Harris Kopell, Benjamin D. Greenberg. Anatomy and physiology of the basal ganglia : Implications for DBS in psy- chiatry[J]. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2008, 32(3) : 408.
  • 6Fabian Klostermann, Lea Krugel, Michael Wahl. Learning about language and speech from Deep Brain Stimulation [ J ]. Neurolinguistics. 2011; 5(7): 1.
  • 7Edith V. Sullivan, Natalie M. Zahr, Torsten Rohlfing, et al. Fiber tracking ftmctionally distinct components of the in- ternal capsule[J]. Neuropsychologia. 2010, 48(14): 4155,.
  • 8Valentina Garihotto, Barbara Borroni, Chiara Agosti, et aL Subcortical and deep cortical atrophy in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration[J]. Neurobiology of Aging. 2011, 32: 875.
  • 9Sonja A. Kotz, Michael Schwartze, Maren Schmidt - Kas- sow, et al. Non - motor basal ganglia functions: A review and proposal for a model of sensory predictability in auditory language perception[J]. Cortex. 2009, 45: 982.
  • 10berg, R. G.E. and Divac, I. The basal ganglia and the con- trol of movement: levels of motor planning. Cognition and the control of movement [J ]. Trends Neurosci, 1981; 4: 122.

共引文献163

同被引文献98

引证文献10

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部