期刊文献+

体育专业大学生自我构念与不同运动项目成绩关系的实证研究

Professional Sports College Students' Self Construct Empirical Research Relationship with Different Sports Achievement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究自我构念与不同运动项目成绩之间的关系,明确它们之间的作用机理,在现有文献研究的基础上,以体育专业在校大学生为研究对象,采用心理测量方法进行实证研究。研究结果表明,独立型自我与互依型自我的体育专业大学生之间存在着显著的差异,具体表现为互依型自我构念维度的均值较明显大于独立型自我构念维度的均值,并且在独立型自我构念维度中,个人主义和行为一致性要比自主性、个人本位和独特性得分高;自我构念与运动项目成绩之间存在较为显著的相关关系和一定的因果关系,自我构念各维度的因子可以联合解释约12.1%的运动项目成绩的变异性。 For studying the construct and the relationship between the different sports scores, clear the action mechanism, on the basis of the existing research, professional sports college students as the research object, by using the method of psychological measurement for empirical research. The results show that the independent model of self and interdependent self-significant difference exists between the professional students of sports, embodied in an interdependent self-construct dimensions mean more apparent than the independent model construct dimension of the mean, and in the independent model self-construct dimensions, individualism and behavioral consistency than autonomy, individualism and uniqueness score high; self construct to sports scores and there was significant relationship between certain causality, self construct joint different dimensions of factors can explain about 12.1% of the sports performance variability.
作者 郅宏宇 ZHI Hong-yu(College of Business Administration, Henan Institute of Engineering, Zhengzhou 450052, Chin)
出处 《河南机电高等专科学校学报》 CAS 2016年第6期59-62,共4页 Journal of Henan Mechanical and Electrical Engineering College
基金 河南省科技厅软科学研究项目(142400410348) 河南省教育厅自然科学项目(14B890001)
关键词 自我构念 体育项目 成绩 量表 construct itself sports results scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献83

  • 1[1]MARKUS H R,KITAYAMA S.Culture and The Self:Implications for Cognition,Emotion,and Motivation[J].Psychological Review,1991,98(4):224-253.
  • 2[2]LAM B T.Self-construal and socio-emotional development among Vietnamesed-American adolescents:An examination of different types of self-construal[J].International Journal of Behavioral Development,2006,30(1):67-75.
  • 3[3]HARDIN E E,LEONG F T L,BHAGWAT A A.Factor structure of the self-construal scale revisited:Implications for the multidimensionality of self-construal[J].Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2004,35:327-345.
  • 4[4]TRIANDIS H C.The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts[J].Psychological Review,1989,96(3):506-520.
  • 5[5]KIM M S,HUNTER J E,MIYAHARA A.Individual-vs.culture-level dimensious of individualism and collectivism:Effeets on preferred conversational styles[J].Communication Monographs,1996,63(1):29-49.
  • 6[6]CROSS S E,BACON P L,MORRIS M L.The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog,2000,78(4):791-808.
  • 7[7]CROSS S E,MADSON L K.Models of the sel:Self-construal and gender[J].Psychological Bulletin,1997,122(1):5-37.
  • 8[8]GUDYKUNST W B,MATSUMOTO Y,TINC-TOOMEY S.Measuring self-construal across cultures:A derived tic analysis[C].Sydney:Paper presented at the International Communication Association,1994:30-38.
  • 9[9]YAMAGUCHI S.KUHJMAN D M,SUGIMORI S.Personality correlates of allocentric tendencies in individualist and collectivist cultures[J].Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,1995,26:658-672.
  • 10[10]KASHlMA Y,YAMAGUCHI S,KIM U.Cnlture,gender,and self:A perspective from individualism collectivism research[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1995,69:925-937.

共引文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部