对《档案法》修订草案中几个问题的认识——兼与徐拥军、李晶伟、蔡美波先生商榷

The cognition on several questions in the revised draft of Archival law——Simultanedusly discuss with Mr.Xu Yong-Jun Li Pin-Wei Cai Mei-Bo

《档案法》修订草案中的法定档案定义的外延小于学理档案定义的外延,并以其明确性、强制性区别于学理定义的严谨性、系统性。"归档"是一项移交档案的工作,不是指"归入档案"。《档案法》的调整对象是以档案的价值来界定的,而非档案的所有权。政府信息公开不等于档案信息公开,《会计法》中的故意销毁会计凭证并不等于故意销毁档案。《档案法》修订草案体现了"以人为本"的立法理念,至于没有设置相应的行政救济和司法救济制度,可以进一步修改完善,也可以通过《档案法实施办法》的修订加以具体规定。

The extension of statutory definition of archives in the revised draft of Archives Law is less than the academic definition of archives, and the explicit and mandatory of the statutory archival definition is distinguished from the rigorous and systematic nature of the academic archival definition. The ＂filing＇is a transfer of the records, and not refers to ＂group under archives＂. The archival value rather than the archival proprietary is the foundation of dividing the adjustment object of Archives Law. The government information publicity is not equal to the disclosure of archival information, and the deliberate destruction of accounting documents in Accounting Law is not equal to the deliberate destruction of archives too. The re- vised draft of Archives Law embodies the legislative concept of ＂People Oriented＂. The problem in Archives Law lacking of the system of administrative relief and judicial relief can be resolved by further revision, or specified through the revision of the enforcement measures of archives law to further improve- ment and perfect.