期刊文献+

神话、共鸣与文学传统 被引量:1

Myth,Echo and Literary Tradition: the Analysis of Northrop Frye's Poetry Criticism
原文传递
导出
摘要 神话作为人类最早的想象和创造性思维形式,因其能够勾勒人类文化的某个特殊领域,而带有独特的严肃性和重述性。文学批评家诺斯罗普·弗莱认为,有启示意义或普世价值的神话意象能够成为读者在尝试了解诗人想象力时一把开启诗人内心的钥匙。读者与诗人的想象力通过相同的集体无意识实现对诗歌内涵心领神会的共鸣,通过某一个神话或仪式的原型,加深诗歌的主题。而文学传统的传递与继承起始于神话为诗人建构的古老文学框架,最终通过不同时空的作者之间产生的共鸣得以实现。弗莱的诗歌评论不仅表现了神话-原型理论的基本观点,同时也是理论作用在具体文本实践中的有效说明,从中不仅能够窥见弗莱的文学偏好,也是了解其理论形成的重要方式。 As the earliest imagination and creative thinking model of human beings, myth carries peculiar seriousness and reiteration because of its ability to sketch human culture's special field. Northrop Frye believes that the apocalyptic and universal mythological images will be the key to the understanding of the poets' imagi- nation for the reader. By mean of the similar collective unconscious, the readers and the poets will get echoes to understand poetry tacitly so that to enhance the theme by the archetype of myth or ceremony. The transfer and heritage of literary tradition starts with the ancient framework constructed by myth, and realizes by the echoes from different writers in different historical periods. The poetry criticism of Northrop Frye not only re- veals the fundamental views of the myth-archetypical theory, but also is the effective explanation of its theory in specific textual practice. Meanwhile, it also can make out Frye's literary preference as well as the process of its theoretical formation.
作者 张文曦 乔国强 ZHANG Wen-xi QIAO Guo-qiang(Center for Foreign Languages and Literature of Postdoctoral Studies, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 200083, China Foreign Languages College, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou 510230, China English College, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 200083, China)
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期128-133,共6页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 广东财经大学2014年度国家级青年培育项目(14GJPY74001)
关键词 神话 共鸣 文学传统 神话-原型批评 myth echo literary tradition myth - archetypical theory
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献32

  • 1周启超.理念上的“对接”与视界上的“超越”——什克洛夫斯基与穆卡若夫斯基的文论之比较[J].外国文学评论,2005(4):28-37. 被引量:2
  • 2林赛·沃特斯.《美学权威主义批判》[M].北京大学出版社,2001年版.第180页.
  • 3林赛·沃特斯.《美学权威主义批判》[M].北京大学出版社,2000年版.第99-100页.
  • 4哈罗德·布鲁姆.《西方正典》[M].南京:译林出版社,2005年4月版.第1963页.
  • 5《批评的剖析》第4页.
  • 6Paul Gray, " Hurrah for Dead WhiteMales," in Time, Oct. 1994, No. 41.
  • 7《诺顿理论与批评》.
  • 8《文类:话语与文化形式》.
  • 9Vincent B. Leitch, Theory Matters, NewYork and London: Routledge, 2003, pp. 18 -21.
  • 10Sigmund Freud, Creative Writers and Day-Dreaming, in David Lodge ed. , 20^th Century Literary Criticism, London: Longman Group Ltd. , 1972, p. 41.

共引文献3

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部