期刊文献+

DCE—MRI渗透性参数及DWI成像ADC值与前列腺癌Gleason评分的相关性研究 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨动态增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)血管渗透性参数及弥散加权成像(DWI)ADC值与前列腺癌(Pca)G1eason评分的相关性。方法收集37例经病理证实的PCa患者,均行磁共振常规扫描、DWI和DCE—MRI扫描。分别测量癌区和正常区域的K trans、Kep、Ve、Vp和ADC值,统计学分析采用两配对样本凇验和spearman相关分析。结果PCa区的Ktrans、Kep、Ve、Vp和ADC值分别为(2.40±1.13)min-1、(1.90±0.72)min-1、(0.82±0.24)、(0.31±0.25)和(0.93±0.43)×10^-3mm2/s,正常区域的Ktrans、Kep、Ve、Vp和ADC值分别为(0.89±0.46)min-1、(0.82±0.42)min-1、(0.86±0.17)、(0.09±0.06)和(1.77±0.30)×10^-3mm2/s,其中Ktrans、Kep、Vp和ADC值两组差异均具有统计学意义(P值均〈0.01),V两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.292)。PCa区ADC值与PCa的主要结构分级、次要结构分级和Gleason评分均呈中度负相关(p均〈0.01),PCa区Vp与PCa的主要结构分级呈低度负相关(P〈0.05),与次要结构分级和Gleason评分无明显相关性,Ktrans、Kep和Ve与PCa的主要结构分级、次要结构分级和Gleason评分均无明显相关性(P〉0.05)。结论PCa区Vp与PCa的主要结构分级呈低度负相关,ADC值与PCa的主要结构分级、次要结构分级和Gleason评分均呈中度负相关,Ktrans、Kep和Ve与Gleason评分均无明显相关性。 Objective To evaluate the correlation of permeability parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI ( DCE-MRI ) and ADC Values of diffusion weighted imaging ( DWI ) with Gleason scores of prostate cancer ( PCa ) . Methods 37 patients suspected with prostate cancer underwent conventional MRI, DWI and DCE-MRI, and all patients were confirmed by pathology. The ADC values and the quantitative permeability parameters such as Ktrans, Kep, Ve, Vp of the lesions and normal tissues were calculated and compared. Statistical analysis was performed using two-matched t-test and spearman correlation analysis. Results The Ktrans, Kep, Ve, Vp and ADC values of the malignant lesions were ( 2.40 ± 1. 13 ) min-1, ( 1.90 ± 0.72 ) min-1, (0.82±0.24) , (0.31±0.25) and (0.93±0.43) ×10^-3mm2/s, while the normal tissues were (0.89±0.46) min-1, (0.82±0.42) min-1, (0.86±0.17) , (0.09±0.06) and (1.77±0.30) ×10^-3mm2/s, respectively. The difference of the Ktrans, Kep, Vp and ADC values between the malignant lesions and the normal tissues was statistically significant ( P〈0.01 ) , while the difference of the Ve was not significant (P=0.292 ) . The ADC values of the lesions were moderate negatively correlated with the main structural grade, secondary structure grade and Gleason scores of prostate cancer ( P〈0.01 ) . There was low negative correlation between Vp and the main structural grade ( P〈0.05 ) , but there was no significant correlation between Vp and the secondary structure grade and Gleason scores of prostate cancer ( P〉0.05 ) . Ktrans, Kep and Vo had no significant correlation with the main structural grade, secondary structure grade and Gleason scores of prostate cancer ( P〉0.05 ) . Conclusions There is low negative correlation between Vp and the main structural grade, The ADC values of the malignant lesions are moderate negatively correlated with the main structural grade, secondary structure grade and Gleason scores of prostate cancer, while Ktrans , Kep and Ve have no significant correlation with the Gleason scores ofprostate cancer.
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2017年第4期600-602,共3页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2014KYB171) 浙江省中医药科技计划项目(2014ZB042)
关键词 磁共振 DCE—MRI DWI 前列腺癌 GLEASON评分 Magnetic resonance imaging Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Diffusion weighted imaging Prostate cancer Gleason scores
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1周桥.前列腺癌Gleason分级[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(4):240-243. 被引量:44
  • 2张继斌,沈钧康,许建铭,须同禄,李晓兵,刘仁坚,汤建英,陆之安.MR灌注成像在前列腺疾病诊断中作用的初步探讨[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(7):699-703. 被引量:3
  • 3何静,王霄英,黄嵘,李飞宇,许玉峰,蒋学祥.前列腺癌骨转移的临床诊断:MRI与同位素骨扫描的比较[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(4):500-504. 被引量:7
  • 4Alonzi R,Padhani AR,Allen C.Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prostate cancer.Eur J Radiol,2007,63:335-350.
  • 5Schlemmer HP,Merkle J,Grobholz R,et al.Can pre-operative contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for prostate cancer predict microvessel density in prostatectomy specimens.Eur Radiol,2004,14:309-317.
  • 6Langer DL,der Kwast TH,Evans AJ,et al.Prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI:logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2,diffusion-weighted imaging,and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.J Magn Reson Imaging,2009,30:327 -334.
  • 7Padhani AR,Gapinski CJ,Macvicar DA,et al.Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer:correlation with morphology and tumour stage,histological grade and PSA.Clin Radiol,2000,55:99-109.
  • 8Buckley DL,Roberts C,Parker GJ,et al.Prostate cancer:evaluation of vascular characteristics with dynamic contrastenhanced T1 -weighted MR imaging:initial experience.Radiology,2004,233:709-715.
  • 9Tofts PS,Brix G,Buckley DL,et al.Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer:standardized quantities and symbols.J Magn Reson Imaging,1999,10:223-232.
  • 10Tofts PS,Kermode AG.Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging.1.Fundamental concepts.Magn Reson Med,1991,17:357-367.

共引文献119

同被引文献52

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部