氨苄西林序贯疗法治疗支气管肺炎的疗效分析

目的比较氨苄西林序贯疗法和氨苄西林常规静脉注射治疗支气管肺炎的临床疗效。方法将240例支气管肺炎患者随机分为序贯疗法组（120例）和静脉滴注组（120例），比较两纽间发烧、咳嗽、肺部啰音等临床症状改善时间差异，比较两组间疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果两组间体温恢复正常时间、咳嗽停止时间、肺部阴影消失时间、肺部哆音消失时间及抗生素持续治疗时间等指标差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05），两组间临床疗效亦无明显差异（P〉0．05）。结论氨苄西林序贯疗法在支气管肺炎的治疗中能替代常规静脉疗法，具有疗效相似、副反应小、依从性高、经济的优点。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of sequential therapy of ampicillin and ampicillin intravenous injection in the treatment of bronchial pneumonia. Methods 240 cases of bronchial pneumonia were randomly divided into sequential therapy group （ 120 cases ） and intravenous injection group （ 120 cases ） . Between the two groups, fever, cough, pulmonary rales and other clinical symptoms, as well as the incidence of adverse reactions were compared. Results Among the two groups, the body temperature recovery time, cough stopping time, lung shadow disappearance time, pulmonary tales disappeared time, duration of treatment of antibiotics and other indicators had no significant difference （ P〉0.05 ） . The curative effect of the two groups had no significant difference （P〉0.05 ） . Conclusion Ampicillin sequential therapy can replace conventional intravenoustherapyinthetreatmentofbronchialpneumonia, with advantages of similar efficaey, low side effect high compliance and economy.