期刊文献+

多b值ADC直方图评价高级别胶质瘤治疗后进展的初步研究 被引量:9

Evaluation of Tumor Progression of High-grade Glioma After Chemoradiotherapy by Histogram of Multiple b Value Diffusion Weighted Imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较多b值扩散加权成像(DWI)中表观扩散系数(ADC)直方图第5百分位数(C_5)评价高级别胶质瘤(HGG)治疗后进展的差异,以确定最佳b值。资料与方法回顾性分析2014年9月-2015年10月河北医科大学第二医院经病理检查确诊并符合纳入标准的41例HGG术后放化疗患者。治疗前、后行增强T1WI、FLAIR和多b值DWI(b=0、1000、2000、3000 s/mm^2)。根据随访结果将患者分为进展组与非进展组,分别获得5组对应于FLAIR高信号区域的ADC直方图,累计频率法计算C_5。比较进展与非进展组不同ADC直方图C_5的差别,确定肿瘤进展的C_5阈值及其准确度。结果进展组所有ADC图C_5均低于非进展组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。高b值ADC图C_5诊断HGG治疗后进展的准确度明显高于低b值者,5组[ADC_((1000/0))、ADC_((2000/0))、ADC_((3000/0))、ADC_((3000/1000))、ADC_((3000/2000))]C_5的受试者工作特性曲线下面积分别为0.717、0.832、0.909、0.933、0.937。当ADC_((3000/2000))图C_5取405.6 mm/s^2时,判断肿瘤进展的敏感度、特异度、阳性和阴性预测值分别为90.9%、89.7%、89.9%、91.0%。结论 ADC直方图C_5值可有效鉴别HGG治疗后进展情况,且高b值者具有更高的准确度。 Pupose To explore the role of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) maps obtained from multiple b value diffusion weighted imaging(DWI) in the assessment of progression of high-grade glioma(HGG) treated with chemoradiotherapy so as to determine the optimal b value. Materials and Methods Forty-one consecutive patients with HGG proved histopathologically who had undergone concurrent chemoradiotherapy at Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from September 2014 to October 2015 were enrolled in the study. All the subjects underwent diffusion weighted MR imaging before and after therapy with b values of 0, 1000, 2000 and 3000 s/mm^2. Based on the clinical and radiographic follow-ups, the patients were divided into progression and nonprogression groups. ADC maps were calculated according to hyperintense FLAIR lesions after completion of chemoradiotherapy. The fifth percentile(C5) in terms of cumulative histograms in different b-value ADC maps in multiple b value DWI was calculated, and the C5 of each ADC map between progression and non-progression groups was compared. Moreover, receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the best cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy for predictors in the differentiation of true progression from non-progression. Results The C5 of all different b value ADC maps were significantly lower in the progression group than those in the non-progression group(P〈0.01). In terms of the accuracy of assessing the progression after therapy, the C5 in the high b value ADC maps was significantly higher than that in the low b value ADC maps. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC) of the C5 was 0.717, 0.832, 0.909, 0.933 and 0.937 respectively in the 5 ADC maps [ADC((1000/0)), ADC((2000/0)), ADC((3000/0)), ADC((3000/1000)) and ADC((3000/2000))]. When the cutoff value of C5 was 405.6 mm/s^2 in ADC((3000/2000)) map, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 90.9%, 89.7%, 89.9% and 91.0%, respectively. Conclusion The C5 in ADC map can effectively differentiate tumor progression of HGG, and that of high b values have higher accuracy.
作者 袁涛 舒彩锟 全冠民 魏建海 郑永利 雷建明 YUAN Tao SHU Caikun QUAN Guanmin WEI Jianhai ZHENG Yongli LEI dianming(Department of Medical Imaging, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, Chin)
出处 《中国医学影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第2期93-97,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 河北省卫生计生委医学科研基金(20130199)
关键词 神经胶质瘤 神经外科手术 药物疗法 放射疗法 磁共振成像 表观扩散系数 Glioma Drug therapy Neurosurgical procedures Radiotherapy Magnetic resonance imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献55

  • 1宋琼,夏黎明,王承缘,冯定义.鼻咽癌放射治疗后放射性脑损伤急性反应早期的1H-MR波谱研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(6):590-593. 被引量:29
  • 2Langleben DD, Segall GM. PET in differentiation of recurrent brain tumor from radiation injury. J Nucl Med, 2000, 41 (11) : 1861-1867.
  • 3Alexiou GA, Tsiouris S, Kyritsis AP, et al. Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis : accuracy of current imaging modalities. J Neurooncol, 2009,95(1) :1-11.
  • 4Hein PA, Eskey CJ, Dunn JF, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: tumor recurrence versus radiation injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2004,25(2): 201-209.
  • 5Schlemmer HP, Bachert P, Herfarth KK, et al. Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after ster- eotaetic radiotherapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003., 22 (7) : 1316-1324.
  • 6Panagiotakos G, Alshamy G, Chan B, et al. Long-term impact of radiation on the stem cell and oligodendrocyte precursors in the brain. PLoS One, 2007,2(7):e588.
  • 7Matsusue E, Fink JR, Rockhill JK, et al. Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physi- ologic MR imaging. Neuroradiology, 2010,52(4):297-306.
  • 8Kumar S, Arbab AS, Jain R, et a|. Devehpment of a novel ani- mal model to differentiate radiation neerosis from tumor recur- fence[J]. J Neurooncol, 2012, 108(3): 411-420.
  • 9Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide fur glioblastoma[J]. N En- gl J Med, 2005, 352(10): 987-996.
  • 10Macdonald DR, Cascino TE. Schold SC Jr, et al. Response crite- ria fir phase studies of supratentorial malignant glioma [J]. J Clin Oncol. 1990, 8(7): 1277-1280.

共引文献73

同被引文献70

引证文献9

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部