摘要
检察机关介入侦查引导取证的理论和实践在我国一直停滞不前。2015年,最高人民检察院第一次明确提出具有可行性的基本方案,以往对该制度的排斥主要来源于对该制度本身定位不明、动摇检警结构的平衡、影响侦查效果等的质疑。最高人民检察院此次提出的改革方案和以往的"提前介入"有明显不同,只是希望建立起检警双方的工作沟通,并不是对检警关系的颠覆性变革。在以审判为中心的改革背景下,本次改革可以提高起诉质量,符合检警双方共同利益,应当尽早形成具体制度。
It have not got any progress about the theory and practice on “ Procuratorates Involve in the Investigation” in China for a long time . It is the first time for the Supreme People,s Procuratorate to propose a feasible plan. There are some oppositions on this subject main source in the question about the oriention of the system is not clear, it would destroy the balance of the relationship between the procuratorates and the police, it may do harm to investigation. This time, the proposed reforms of the supreme people, s procuratorate is completely different from “Involving in the investigation”. The Supreme People, s Procuratorate just wants to establish a communication mechanism instead of complete reform . This scheme is not only can improve the quality of prosecution but also accord with the common intevests of both parties. We should form the concrete system as soon as possible.
出处
《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期52-56,共5页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金
最高人民检察院2015年检察理论研究重点课题:"以审判为中心背景下的诉审关系"(GJ2015B08)
重大课题:"以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革与检察工作模式的转型"(GJ2015A03)
湖北省人民检察院检察理论研究项目重点课题:<以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革与检察工作模式转型>(HJ2015A06)的研究成果
关键词
引导侦查
引导取证
理论误解
guide investigation
guide obtain evidence
theoretical misunderstanding