期刊文献+

横切口腹膜外单层缝合法用于阑尾脓肿切除的临床研究 被引量:3

Clinical study of transverse abdominal incision sutured by single layer extraperitoneal closure in treatment of appendiceal abscess
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价横切口腹膜外单层缝合法应用于阑尾脓肿切除的临床效果。方法纳入研究的阑尾脓肿需行手术治疗的患者197例,随机分成单层缝合组91例和分层缝合组106例,分别采用横切口腹膜外单层缝合法及常规经腹直肌切口分层缝合法进行阑尾脓肿切除术,对比2种手术方式的临床指标、医疗费用以及术后半年的并发症发生率。结果与分层缝合组比较,单层缝合组的手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后24 h内下床活动者多、肛门排气时间早、切口感染率低、7 d内切口Ⅰ期愈合并拆线率高、医疗费用低(P均<0.05)。2组患者在术后48 h内应用镇痛药者比例及并发症发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论应用横切口腹膜外单层缝合术行阑尾脓肿切除术具有操作简单、安全有效、经济实用等优点。 Objective To assess the clinical efficacy of transverse abdominal incision sutured by single layer extraperitoneal closure in the treatment of appendiceal abscess.Methods A total of 197 patients with appendiceal abscess scheduled to undergo surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into the single layer(n=91) and multi-layer suture groups(n=106).In the single layer suture group,patients underwent transverse abdominal incision sutured by single layer extraperitoneal closure and those in the other group received transrectus incision sutured by multi-layer closure technique.Clinical parameters,medical expanse and the postoperative 6-month incidence of surgical complications were statistically compared between two groups.Results Compared with their counterparts in the multi-layer suture group,patients in the single layer suture group had significantly shorter operative time,less intraoperative blood loss,higher proportion of off-bed activity within postoperative 24 h and earlier anal exhaust time,lower incidence of incisional infection,higher rate of wound healing and suture removal within postoperative 7 d and lower medical cost(all P〈0.05).There was no statistical significance in the percentage of analgesics users within postoperative 48 h and the incidence of postoperative complications between two groups(both P〉0.05).Conclusion Transverse abdominal incision sutured by single layer extraperitoneal closure is a simple,efficacious,safe and low-cost technique to treat appendiceal abscess.
出处 《新医学》 2017年第3期160-162,共3页 Journal of New Medicine
基金 广州市卫生局医药卫生科技项目(20141A010081) 广州医科大学青年科研基金项目(2014A29)
关键词 阑尾脓肿 横切口 腹膜外单层缝合 Appendiceal abscess Transverse incision Extraperitoneal single layer suture
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1蔡永利,周志华,莫卫忠.化脓性阑尾炎306例术后并发症的预防与处理[J].中国医师杂志,2006,8(S1):176-177. 被引量:5
  • 2周晓云.小切口阑尾切除术247例临床体会[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2006,13(1):102-103. 被引量:20
  • 3Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R. Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? [J]. Ann Surg,2006, 244(5 ) :656 -660.
  • 4Karim H, Chafik K, Karim K, et al. Risk factors for surgical wound infection in digestive surgery. Retrospective study of 3. 000 surgical wounds [ J ]. Tunis Med ,2000,78 ( 11 ) :634 - 640.
  • 5Chiang RA, Chen SL, Tsai YC, et al. Comparison of primary wound closure versus open wound management in perforated appendicitis[J].J Formos Med Assoc. 2006,105 ( 10 ) :791 - 795.
  • 6Rucinski J, Fabian T, Panaqopoulos G, et al. Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis:a meta-analytic study of 2532 patients indicates that the incision should be closed primarily [ J ]. Surgery, 2000,127(2) :136 - 141.
  • 7Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R. Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? [ J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(5) : 656-660.
  • 8Karim H, Chafik K, Karim K, et al. Risk factors for surgical wound infection in digestive surgery[ J]. Retrospective study of 3000 surgical wounds[ J]. Tunis Med,2000,78(11):634-640.
  • 9Chiang RA, Chen SL, Tsai YC, et al. Comparison of primary wound closure versus open wound management in perforated appendicitis[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2006, 105(10) :791-795.
  • 10Rucinski J, Fabian T, Panaqopoulos G, et al. Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis: a meta-analytic study of 2532 patients indicates that the incision should be closed primarily [ J ]. Surgery, 2000,127(2) : 136-141.

共引文献47

同被引文献18

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部