期刊文献+

国际投资条约仲裁的透明度问题探析

Discussions on the Issue of Transparency in International Investment Treaty-based Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 透明度是国际投资仲裁领域受到高度关注的重要话题,其在《北美自由贸易协定》《国际投资争端解决中心仲裁规则》《联合国国际贸易法委员会透明度规则》《联合国投资仲裁透明度公约》《国际商会仲裁院仲裁规则》中都确立了规范基础。但总体来看,不同的仲裁庭在处理透明度的问题上立场各异,这尤其体现在仲裁庭对法庭之友请求提交书面意见的接受方面。值得肯定的是,强化透明度不仅有益于为当事人提供稳定的、可预见的程序参与机会,而且也是促使仲裁庭关注社会公共利益的重要环节。 Transparency is a highly concentrated topic in the field of international investment arbitration, which has legal basis in the NAFTA, ICSID Arbitration Rules, UNCITRAL Transparency Rules, UN Transparency Convention, ICC Arbitration Rules. In general, different arbitral tribunals held various stances towards the method dealing with the transparency in investment arbitration, which is particularly obvious in the tribunal^ accepting of written submissions. But we should recognize that the transparency not only gives a stable and predictable procedural participation for parties, but also is beneficial to promote public interest for the arbitral tribunal.
作者 张建
出处 《保定学院学报》 2017年第2期34-39,共6页 Journal of Baoding University
基金 国家留学基金委(留金发[2016]3100号)联合培养博士生项目"国际投资仲裁管辖权研究"(201607070108)的阶段性成果
关键词 投资仲裁 透明度 公众参与 法庭之友 investment arbitration transparency public participation amicus curiae
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献13

  • 1李广辉,薛胜利.合并仲裁法律制度探究——兼论中国合并仲裁制度之构建[J].河北法学,2006,24(6):73-78. 被引量:13
  • 2Iris Goldner.Issues of Comparative Law:Multi-Party Arbitration. Croatian Arbitration Yearbook . 2001
  • 3Alan Redfern,Martin Hunter,Nigel Blackaby,Constantine Partasides.Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Journal of Women s Health .
  • 4ICC Case NO.5989 1989.ICC Case NO.5989 1989. Contractor v.Employers A&B,XV Y.B Com.Arb.74. Journal of Women s Health . 1990
  • 5Okuma Kazutake.Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration:Consolidation of Multiparty and Classwide Arbitration. Annual Survey of International& Comparative Law . 2003
  • 6Jonathan R Waldron.Resolving a Split: May Courts Order Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings Absent Express Agreement by the Parties?. J. Disp. Resol . 2005
  • 7James M.Hosking."The Third Party Non-Signatory‘s Ability To Compel International Commercial Arbitration:Doing Justice Without Destroying Consent". Pepp.Disp.Resol.L.J . 2004
  • 8Arzu ONGUR ERGAN.The NewArbitration Rules Of International Chamber Of Commerce. Ankara Bar Review . 2011
  • 9Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Western Seas Shipping Co. 743 F. 2d 635 (9th Cir), cert, denied, 469 U. S. 1061 . 1984
  • 10Carl H.Johnson,Pete D.A.Petersen.Is the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act a Good Fit for Alaska?. Alaska Law Review . 2002

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部